chr6-36328609-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points: 2P and 6B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6_Moderate
The NM_001010903.5(BNIP5):c.716A>G(p.Lys239Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000137 in 1,459,858 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001010903.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001010903.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BNIP5 | NM_001010903.5 | MANE Select | c.716A>G | p.Lys239Arg | missense | Exon 3 of 12 | NP_001010903.3 | P0C671 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BNIP5 | ENST00000437635.3 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.716A>G | p.Lys239Arg | missense | Exon 3 of 12 | ENSP00000418983.1 | P0C671 | |
| BNIP5 | ENST00000860604.1 | c.716A>G | p.Lys239Arg | missense | Exon 3 of 12 | ENSP00000530663.1 | |||
| BNIP5 | ENST00000860607.1 | c.635A>G | p.Lys212Arg | missense | Exon 3 of 12 | ENSP00000530666.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000398 AC: 1AN: 251486 AF XY: 0.00000736 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000137 AC: 2AN: 1459858Hom.: 0 Cov.: 29 AF XY: 0.00000138 AC XY: 1AN XY: 726432 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at