chr6-38923080-C-T

Position:

chr6-38923080-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points: 2P and 9B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6BS1

The NM_001206927.2(DNAH8):c.10685C>T(p.Thr3562Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000446 in 1,613,354 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000079 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000041 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

DNAH8
NM_001206927.2 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0930

Variant links:

Genes affected

DNAH8 (HGNC:2952): (dynein axonemal heavy chain 8) The protein encoded by this gene is a heavy chain of an axonemal dynein involved in sperm and respiratory cilia motility. Axonemal dyneins generate force through hydrolysis of ATP and binding to microtubules. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2012]

DNAH8 links:

DNAH8-AS1 (HGNC:40188): (DNAH8 antisense RNA 1)

DNAH8-AS1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points.

PM2

Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.01460582).

BP6

Variant 6-38923080-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr6-38923080-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 454537.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=1, Uncertain_significance=1}.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0000788 (12/152238) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.00193 (10/5180). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00105. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 5 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
DNAH8	NM_001206927.2 linkuse as main transcript	c.10685C>T	p.Thr3562Met	missense_variant	72/93	ENST00000327475.11	NP_001193856.1
DNAH8-AS1	NR_038401.1 linkuse as main transcript	n.782+5G>A		splice_donor_5th_base_variant, intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
DNAH8	ENST00000327475.11 linkuse as main transcript	c.10685C>T	p.Thr3562Met	missense_variant	72/93	5	NM_001206927.2	ENSP00000333363	P2
DNAH8-AS1	ENST00000416948.1 linkuse as main transcript	n.779G>A		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	4/4	2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000789

AC:

AN:

152120

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.0000655

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00193

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000128

AC:

AN:

250482

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000126

AC XY:

AN XY:

135372

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00153

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000411

AC:

AN:

1461116

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000440

AC XY:

AN XY:

726810

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.000858

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000139

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00000270

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000166

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000788

AC:

AN:

152238

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000672

AC XY:

AN XY:

74438

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.0000654

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00193

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.0000466

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000340

ExAC

AF:

0.0000989

AC:

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000867

AC:

AN:

3476

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:2

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Primary ciliary dyskinesia

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Aug 28, 2021

This sequence change replaces threonine with methionine at codon 3562 of the DNAH8 protein (p.Thr3562Met). The threonine residue is weakly conserved and there is a moderate physicochemical difference between threonine and methionine. This variant is present in population databases (rs373914023, ExAC 0.1%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with DNAH8-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 454537). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function output the following: SIFT: "Tolerated"; PolyPhen-2: "Not Available"; Align-GVGD: "Class C0". The methionine amino acid residue is found in multiple mammalian species, which suggests that this missense change does not adversely affect protein function. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

not specified

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Ambry Genetics

Jun 12, 2023

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

DNAH8-related disorder

Benign:1

Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided

clinical testing

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Apr 14, 2022

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.075

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.50

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.52

CADD

Benign

DANN

Benign

0.92

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.026

T;T;T

Eigen

Benign

-1.0

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.97

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.023

LIST_S2

Benign

0.62

T;T;T

M_CAP

Benign

0.026

MetaRNN

Benign

0.015

T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-1.0

MutationAssessor

Benign

1.1

.;.;L

MutationTaster

Benign

1.0

N;N;N

PrimateAI

Benign

0.30

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.87

.;N;N

REVEL

Benign

0.088

Sift

Benign

0.24

.;T;T

Polyphen

0.0040

.;.;B

Vest4

0.20

MVP

0.54

MPC

0.13

ClinPred

0.014

GERP RS

0.22

Varity_R

0.014

gMVP

0.18

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over