chr6-39912909-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2
The NM_001358530.2(MOCS1):c.853G>A(p.Glu285Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000994 in 1,614,142 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001358530.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOCS1 | NM_001358530.2 | c.853G>A | p.Glu285Lys | missense_variant | 7/11 | ENST00000340692.10 | NP_001345459.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOCS1 | ENST00000340692.10 | c.853G>A | p.Glu285Lys | missense_variant | 7/11 | 5 | NM_001358530.2 | ENSP00000344794.5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000867 AC: 132AN: 152174Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000767 AC: 193AN: 251492Hom.: 3 AF XY: 0.000846 AC XY: 115AN XY: 135920
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00101 AC: 1473AN: 1461850Hom.: 3 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00102 AC XY: 739AN XY: 727232
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000867 AC: 132AN: 152292Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000886 AC XY: 66AN XY: 74468
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Sulfite oxidase deficiency due to molybdenum cofactor deficiency type A Uncertain:3Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 30, 2024 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Oct 31, 2018 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genomic Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences | Aug 07, 2018 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Inborn genetic diseases Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Feb 11, 2021 | The c.853G>A (p.E285K) alteration is located in exon 6 (coding exon 6) of the MOCS1 gene. This alteration results from a G to A substitution at nucleotide position 853, causing the glutamic acid (E) at amino acid position 285 to be replaced by a lysine (K). The p.E285K alteration is predicted to be tolerated by in silico analysis. Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The MOCS1 p.Glu285Lys variant was identified in 1 of 52 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.019) from individuals with a known or suspected mitochondrial disorder, however the variant was suggested to be benign (Vasta_2012_PMID:22494076). The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs140243105), ClinVar (classified as uncertain significance by Illumina, Fulgent Genetics, CeGaT Praxis fuer Humangenetik Tuebingen and Genomic Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences; classified as likely benign by Mendelics when found in combination with the p.E285K variant) and LOVD 3.0 (classified as likely benign). The variant was identified in control databases in 210 of 282890 chromosomes (3 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.0007423 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database March 6, 2019, v2.1.1). The variant was observed in the following populations: Other in 8 of 7226 chromosomes (freq: 0.001107), European (non-Finnish) in 138 of 129192 chromosomes (freq: 0.001068), Latino in 37 of 35440 chromosomes (freq: 0.001044), South Asian in 20 of 30616 chromosomes (freq: 0.000653), Ashkenazi Jewish in 4 of 10370 chromosomes (freq: 0.000386), African in 2 of 24968 chromosomes (freq: 0.00008), European (Finnish) in 1 of 25124 chromosomes (freq: 0.00004), but was not observed in the East Asian population. The p.Glu285 residue is not conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. - |
MOCS1-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Oct 03, 2023 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Nov 01, 2024 | MOCS1: BP4, BS2 - |
Intellectual disability Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Centre de Biologie Pathologie Génétique, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille | Jan 01, 2019 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at