chr6-43650410-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_152732.5(RSPH9):c.263C>T(p.Ala88Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00111 in 1,613,736 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 17 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_152732.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPH9 | NM_152732.5 | c.263C>T | p.Ala88Val | missense_variant | 2/5 | ENST00000372163.5 | NP_689945.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPH9 | ENST00000372163.5 | c.263C>T | p.Ala88Val | missense_variant | 2/5 | 1 | NM_152732.5 | ENSP00000361236.4 | ||
RSPH9 | ENST00000372165.8 | c.263C>T | p.Ala88Val | missense_variant | 2/6 | 2 | ENSP00000361238.4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00598 AC: 910AN: 152158Hom.: 11 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00141 AC: 355AN: 251464Hom.: 4 AF XY: 0.00104 AC XY: 141AN XY: 135906
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000598 AC: 874AN: 1461460Hom.: 6 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000519 AC XY: 377AN XY: 727024
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00600 AC: 914AN: 152276Hom.: 11 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00545 AC XY: 406AN XY: 74440
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Primary ciliary dyskinesia Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 29, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Apr 15, 2016 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Feb 03, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Primary ciliary dyskinesia 12 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at