chr6-65295886-C-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 0P and 2B. BP4_Moderate

The NM_001142800.2(EYS):​c.2000G>C​(p.Arg667Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000517 in 1,547,514 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R667C) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000013 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0000043 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

EYS
NM_001142800.2 missense

Scores

2
17

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, single submitter U:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.999

Publications

5 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
EYS (HGNC:21555): (eyes shut homolog) The product of this gene contains multiple epidermal growth factor (EGF)-like and LamG domains. The protein is expressed in the photoreceptor layer of the retina, and the gene is mutated in autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2008]
EYS Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • EYS-related retinopathy
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • retinitis pigmentosa
    Inheritance: AR, AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Orphanet
  • retinitis pigmentosa 25
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Laboratory for Molecular Medicine

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.23518768).

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
EYSNM_001142800.2 linkc.2000G>C p.Arg667Pro missense_variant Exon 12 of 43 ENST00000503581.6 NP_001136272.1 Q5T1H1-1
EYSNM_001292009.2 linkc.2000G>C p.Arg667Pro missense_variant Exon 12 of 44 NP_001278938.1 Q5T1H1-3

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
EYSENST00000503581.6 linkc.2000G>C p.Arg667Pro missense_variant Exon 12 of 43 5 NM_001142800.2 ENSP00000424243.1 Q5T1H1-1
EYSENST00000370621.7 linkc.2000G>C p.Arg667Pro missense_variant Exon 12 of 44 1 ENSP00000359655.3 Q5T1H1-3
EYSENST00000370615.3 linkn.438G>C non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 2 of 2 3
EYSENST00000447127.1 linkn.456G>C non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 3 of 3 4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000132
AC:
2
AN:
151662
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000295
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0000130
AC:
2
AN:
154228
AF XY:
0.0000122
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000231
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00000430
AC:
6
AN:
1395852
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
38
AF XY:
0.00000291
AC XY:
2
AN XY:
688146
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
31536
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
35536
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
25106
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
35582
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000513
AC:
4
AN:
77974
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
49210
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5686
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00000186
AC:
2
AN:
1077344
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
57878
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.525
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1
1
2
2
3
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000132
AC:
2
AN:
151662
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00
AC XY:
0
AN XY:
74054
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
41334
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
15202
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3464
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5176
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4818
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10520
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
316
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000295
AC:
2
AN:
67836
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2084
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.500
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
0
1
1
2
2
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Alfa
AF:
0.00
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.00000756

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:1
Jul 25, 2022
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This sequence change replaces arginine, which is basic and polar, with proline, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 667 of the EYS protein (p.Arg667Pro). This variant is present in population databases (no rsID available, gnomAD 0.004%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with EYS-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 1000726). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (SIFT, PolyPhen-2, Align-GVGD) all suggest that this variant is likely to be tolerated. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

Retinitis pigmentosa 25 Uncertain:1
Mar 18, 2021
Natera, Inc.
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.21
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.15
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.32
CADD
Benign
19
DANN
Benign
0.84
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.055
.;T
Eigen
Benign
-1.2
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.1
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.29
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.25
T;T
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.12
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.24
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.87
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.34
N;N
PhyloP100
1.0
PrimateAI
Benign
0.29
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.14
N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.23
Sift
Uncertain
0.0030
D;D
Sift4G
Benign
0.14
T;T
Polyphen
0.0030
B;.
Vest4
0.17
MutPred
0.74
Loss of MoRF binding (P = 0.0257);Loss of MoRF binding (P = 0.0257);
MVP
0.18
MPC
0.0094
ClinPred
0.063
T
GERP RS
2.3
Varity_R
0.20
gMVP
0.96
Mutation Taster
=39/61
disease causing

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.020
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs549456693; hg19: chr6-66005779; API