chr6-73644452-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_012434.5(SLC17A5):​c.246G>A​(p.Ala82Ala) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.082 in 1,613,430 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 6,490 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.11 ( 1063 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.079 ( 5427 hom. )

Consequence

SLC17A5
NM_012434.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:12

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.753
Variant links:
Genes affected
SLC17A5 (HGNC:10933): (solute carrier family 17 member 5) This gene encodes a membrane transporter that exports free sialic acids that have been cleaved off of cell surface lipids and proteins from lysosomes. Mutations in this gene cause sialic acid storage diseases, including infantile sialic acid storage disorder and and Salla disease, an adult form. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.5).
BP6
Variant 6-73644452-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr6-73644452-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 130316.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr6-73644452-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.753 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.162 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
SLC17A5NM_012434.5 linkc.246G>A p.Ala82Ala synonymous_variant 2/11 ENST00000355773.6 NP_036566.1 Q9NRA2-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
SLC17A5ENST00000355773.6 linkc.246G>A p.Ala82Ala synonymous_variant 2/111 NM_012434.5 ENSP00000348019.5 Q9NRA2-1
SLC17A5ENST00000481996.1 linkn.12G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 1/54

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.107
AC:
16303
AN:
152026
Hom.:
1062
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.154
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0329
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.143
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.157
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.171
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0959
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0484
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.177
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0730
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.136
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0988
AC:
24837
AN:
251362
Hom.:
1433
AF XY:
0.0962
AC XY:
13074
AN XY:
135854
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.150
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.131
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.155
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.170
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.102
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0488
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0732
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.114
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0793
AC:
115919
AN:
1461286
Hom.:
5427
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0798
AC XY:
58003
AN XY:
727000
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.156
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.132
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.157
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.176
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.103
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0504
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0676
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0981
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.107
AC:
16324
AN:
152144
Hom.:
1063
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.107
AC XY:
7931
AN XY:
74384
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.154
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.143
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.157
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.171
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.0966
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0484
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0730
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.135
Alfa
AF:
0.0856
Hom.:
1537
Bravo
AF:
0.117
Asia WGS
AF:
0.143
AC:
497
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0832
EpiControl
AF:
0.0836

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:12
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago-Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxNov 09, 2015This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Dec 11, 2013- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Salla disease Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 03, 2025- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJul 10, 2021- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Sep 16, 2020- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Sialic acid storage disease, severe infantile type Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJul 10, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpFeb 08, 2017Variant summary: The SLC17A5 c.246G>A (p.Ala82Ala) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide, resulting in a synonymous change. One in silico tool predicts a polymorphism outcome for this variant. 5/5 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. This variant was found in 11883/121310 control chromosomes (671 homozygotes) at a frequency of 0.0979557, which is approximately 41 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic SLC17A5 variant (0.0023717), strong evidence that this variant is a benign polymorphism. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases classified this variant as benign. The variant of interest has not, to our knowledge, been reported in affected individuals via publications nor evaluated for functional impact by in vivo/vitro studies. Due to the synonymous nature of the variant, the lack of predicted effect on splicing and the high frequency in the contol population, this variant is classified as benign. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingMayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo ClinicApr 19, 2017- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.50
CADD
Benign
13
DANN
Benign
0.48

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs472294; hg19: chr6-74354175; API