chr6-79485431-T-C
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 2P and 5B. PM2BP4_StrongBS1_Supporting
The NM_001122769.3(LCA5):c.*1573A>G variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00119 in 152,304 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0012 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0 ( 0 hom. )
Failed GnomAD Quality Control
Consequence
LCA5
NM_001122769.3 3_prime_UTR
NM_001122769.3 3_prime_UTR
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.203
Genes affected
LCA5 (HGNC:31923): (lebercilin LCA5) This gene encodes a protein that is thought to be involved in centrosomal or ciliary functions. Mutations in this gene cause Leber congenital amaurosis type V. Alternatively spliced transcript variants are described. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2009]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.84).
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00119 (181/152304) while in subpopulation AMR AF= 0.00818 (125/15290). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00701. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 89 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCA5 | NM_001122769.3 | c.*1573A>G | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 8/8 | ENST00000369846.9 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCA5 | ENST00000369846.9 | c.*1573A>G | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 8/8 | 1 | NM_001122769.3 | P1 | ||
LCA5 | ENST00000392959.5 | c.*1573A>G | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 9/9 | 1 | P1 | |||
ENST00000652956.1 | n.469+3991T>C | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00117 AC: 178AN: 152186Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
178
AN:
152186
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD4 exome Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AC0 AF: 0.00 AC: 0AN: 432Hom.: 0 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 260
GnomAD4 exome
Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AC0
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
432
Hom.:
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
AC XY:
0
AN XY:
260
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00119 AC: 181AN: 152304Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00120 AC XY: 89AN XY: 74474
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
181
AN:
152304
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
89
AN XY:
74474
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
6
AN:
3472
ClinVar
Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Leber congenital amaurosis 5 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at