chr6:160585140-T>G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBA1
The NM_005577.4(LPA):c.4195A>C(p.Thr1399Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.129 in 1,613,538 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 14,785 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_005577.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_005577.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LPA | NM_005577.4 | MANE Select | c.4195A>C | p.Thr1399Pro | missense | Exon 26 of 39 | NP_005568.2 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LPA | ENST00000316300.10 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.4195A>C | p.Thr1399Pro | missense | Exon 26 of 39 | ENSP00000321334.6 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0990 AC: 15048AN: 152070Hom.: 949 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.110 AC: 27534AN: 250654 AF XY: 0.113 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.132 AC: 192617AN: 1461350Hom.: 13836 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.131 AC XY: 95584AN XY: 727010 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0989 AC: 15053AN: 152188Hom.: 949 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0976 AC XY: 7265AN XY: 74422 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at