chr7-107563997-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points: 2P and 9B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6BS1

The ENST00000347053.8(COG5):​c.-101C>T variant causes a 5 prime UTR premature start codon gain change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000254 in 1,250,612 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00018 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00026 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

COG5
ENST00000347053.8 5_prime_UTR_premature_start_codon_gain

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0490
Variant links:
Genes affected
COG5 (HGNC:14857): (component of oligomeric golgi complex 5) The protein encoded by this gene is one of eight proteins (Cog1-8) which form a Golgi-localized complex (COG) required for normal Golgi morphology and function. The encoded protein is organized with conserved oligomeric Golgi complex components 6, 7 and 8 into a sub-complex referred to as lobe B. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. Mutations in this gene result in congenital disorder of glycosylation type 2I.[provided by RefSeq, Jan 2011]
DUS4L (HGNC:21517): (dihydrouridine synthase 4 like) Predicted to enable tRNA dihydrouridine synthase activity. Predicted to be involved in tRNA dihydrouridine synthesis. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]
DUS4L-BCAP29 (HGNC:54422): (DUS4L-BCAP29 readthrough) This locus represents naturally occurring readthrough transcription between the neighboring DUS4L (dihydrouridine synthase 4 like) and BCAP29 (B cell receptor associated protein 29) genes on chromosome 7. The readthrough transcript encodes a fusion protein that shares sequence identity with each individual gene product. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2019]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points.

PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.89).
BP6
Variant 7-107563997-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-107563997-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 389379.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=1, Uncertain_significance=1}.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.000263 (292/1108764) while in subpopulation AMR AF= 0.000968 (30/31000). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000696. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 141 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 35. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
DUS4LNM_181581.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.-323G>A 5_prime_UTR_variant 1/8 ENST00000265720.8 NP_853559.1 O95620-1A4D0R5

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
DUS4LENST00000265720 linkuse as main transcriptc.-323G>A 5_prime_UTR_variant 1/82 NM_181581.3 ENSP00000265720.3 O95620-1
DUS4L-BCAP29ENST00000673757 linkuse as main transcriptc.-323G>A 5_prime_UTR_variant 1/15 ENSP00000501026.1 A0A669KAY5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000183
AC:
26
AN:
141696
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000251
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000554
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00182
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000156
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000499
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000360
AC:
55
AN:
152740
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000383
AC XY:
32
AN XY:
83610
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000138
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000945
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000842
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000223
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000321
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000230
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000263
AC:
292
AN:
1108764
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
35
AF XY:
0.000257
AC XY:
141
AN XY:
549548
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000121
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000968
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00145
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000136
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000245
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000406
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000183
AC:
26
AN:
141848
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000160
AC XY:
11
AN XY:
68888
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000250
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000553
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00182
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000156
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000493
Alfa
AF:
0.000268
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000246

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

COG5-congenital disorder of glycosylation Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxOct 25, 2016This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
COG5-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesDec 13, 2019This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.89
CADD
Benign
4.6
DANN
Benign
0.77
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.0

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs555908807; hg19: chr7-107204442; API