chr7-107563997-G-A
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points: 2P and 9B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6BS1
The ENST00000347053.8(COG5):c.-101C>T variant causes a 5 prime UTR premature start codon gain change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000254 in 1,250,612 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00018 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00026 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
COG5
ENST00000347053.8 5_prime_UTR_premature_start_codon_gain
ENST00000347053.8 5_prime_UTR_premature_start_codon_gain
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.0490
Genes affected
COG5 (HGNC:14857): (component of oligomeric golgi complex 5) The protein encoded by this gene is one of eight proteins (Cog1-8) which form a Golgi-localized complex (COG) required for normal Golgi morphology and function. The encoded protein is organized with conserved oligomeric Golgi complex components 6, 7 and 8 into a sub-complex referred to as lobe B. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. Mutations in this gene result in congenital disorder of glycosylation type 2I.[provided by RefSeq, Jan 2011]
DUS4L (HGNC:21517): (dihydrouridine synthase 4 like) Predicted to enable tRNA dihydrouridine synthase activity. Predicted to be involved in tRNA dihydrouridine synthesis. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]
DUS4L-BCAP29 (HGNC:54422): (DUS4L-BCAP29 readthrough) This locus represents naturally occurring readthrough transcription between the neighboring DUS4L (dihydrouridine synthase 4 like) and BCAP29 (B cell receptor associated protein 29) genes on chromosome 7. The readthrough transcript encodes a fusion protein that shares sequence identity with each individual gene product. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2019]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points.
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.89).
BP6
Variant 7-107563997-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-107563997-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 389379.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=1, Uncertain_significance=1}.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.000263 (292/1108764) while in subpopulation AMR AF= 0.000968 (30/31000). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000696. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 141 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 35. This position pass quality control queck.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DUS4L | NM_181581.3 | c.-323G>A | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 1/8 | ENST00000265720.8 | NP_853559.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DUS4L | ENST00000265720 | c.-323G>A | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 1/8 | 2 | NM_181581.3 | ENSP00000265720.3 | |||
DUS4L-BCAP29 | ENST00000673757 | c.-323G>A | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 1/15 | ENSP00000501026.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000183 AC: 26AN: 141696Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
26
AN:
141696
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000360 AC: 55AN: 152740Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000383 AC XY: 32AN XY: 83610
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
55
AN:
152740
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
32
AN XY:
83610
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000263 AC: 292AN: 1108764Hom.: 0 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.000257 AC XY: 141AN XY: 549548
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
292
AN:
1108764
Hom.:
Cov.:
35
AF XY:
AC XY:
141
AN XY:
549548
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000183 AC: 26AN: 141848Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000160 AC XY: 11AN XY: 68888
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
26
AN:
141848
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
11
AN XY:
68888
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
COG5-congenital disorder of glycosylation Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Oct 25, 2016 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
COG5-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Dec 13, 2019 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at