chr7-130671678-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 0P and 2B. BP4_Moderate
The NM_052933.4(TSGA13):c.641G>A(p.Arg214Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000832 in 1,442,978 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_052933.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_052933.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSGA13 | NM_052933.4 | MANE Select | c.641G>A | p.Arg214Lys | missense | Exon 7 of 8 | NP_443165.1 | Q96PP4 | |
| TSGA13 | NM_001304968.2 | c.641G>A | p.Arg214Lys | missense | Exon 8 of 9 | NP_001291897.1 | Q96PP4 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSGA13 | ENST00000356588.8 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.641G>A | p.Arg214Lys | missense | Exon 7 of 8 | ENSP00000348996.3 | Q96PP4 | |
| TSGA13 | ENST00000456951.5 | TSL:2 | c.641G>A | p.Arg214Lys | missense | Exon 8 of 9 | ENSP00000406047.1 | Q96PP4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000162 AC: 4AN: 246354 AF XY: 0.0000150 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000832 AC: 12AN: 1442978Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000418 AC XY: 3AN XY: 718156 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at