chr7-138706385-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_020632.3(ATP6V0A4):c.*239G>A variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.201 in 529,434 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 11,700 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_020632.3 3_prime_UTR
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- renal tubular acidosis, distal, 3, with or without sensorineural hearing lossInheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- autosomal recessive distal renal tubular acidosisInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_020632.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATP6V0A4 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.*239G>A | 3_prime_UTR | Exon 22 of 22 | ENSP00000308122.2 | Q9HBG4 | |||
| ATP6V0A4 | TSL:5 | c.*239G>A | 3_prime_UTR | Exon 21 of 21 | ENSP00000376774.1 | Q9HBG4 | |||
| ATP6V0A4 | c.*239G>A | 3_prime_UTR | Exon 22 of 22 | ENSP00000496421.1 | Q9HBG4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.222 AC: 33765AN: 151998Hom.: 4035 Cov.: 31 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.193 AC: 72706AN: 377318Hom.: 7659 Cov.: 3 AF XY: 0.195 AC XY: 38713AN XY: 198736 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.222 AC: 33776AN: 152116Hom.: 4041 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.221 AC XY: 16425AN XY: 74372 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at