chr7-140753332-T-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. Variant got 8 ACMG points: 8P and 0B. PM1PM2PM5PP2PP5
The NM_001374258.1(BRAF):c.1923A>T(p.Lys641Asn) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000124 in 1,612,878 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely pathogenic (no stars). Another nucleotide change resulting in same amino acid change has been previously reported as Uncertain significancein ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. K641R) has been classified as Likely pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001374258.1 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_pathogenic. Variant got 8 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRAF | NM_001374258.1 | c.1923A>T | p.Lys641Asn | missense_variant | 16/20 | ENST00000644969.2 | |
BRAF | NM_004333.6 | c.1803A>T | p.Lys601Asn | missense_variant | 15/18 | ENST00000646891.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRAF | ENST00000644969.2 | c.1923A>T | p.Lys641Asn | missense_variant | 16/20 | NM_001374258.1 | |||
BRAF | ENST00000646891.2 | c.1803A>T | p.Lys601Asn | missense_variant | 15/18 | NM_004333.6 | P4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152188Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.85e-7 AC: 1AN: 1460690Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00000138 AC XY: 1AN XY: 726696
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152188Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74358
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Melanoma Pathogenic:1
Likely pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided | literature only | Database of Curated Mutations (DoCM) | Jul 14, 2015 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at