chr7-147132472-C-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS2

The NM_014141.6(CNTNAP2):c.1311C>T(p.Ile437Ile) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00346 in 1,613,648 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 16 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0033 ( 4 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0035 ( 12 hom. )

Consequence

CNTNAP2
NM_014141.6 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.867

Variant links:

Genes affected

CNTNAP2 (HGNC:13830): (contactin associated protein 2) This gene encodes a member of the neurexin family which functions in the vertebrate nervous system as cell adhesion molecules and receptors. This protein, like other neurexin proteins, contains epidermal growth factor repeats and laminin G domains. In addition, it includes an F5/8 type C domain, discoidin/neuropilin- and fibrinogen-like domains, thrombospondin N-terminal-like domains and a putative PDZ binding site. This protein is localized at the juxtaparanodes of myelinated axons, and mediates interactions between neurons and glia during nervous system development and is also involved in localization of potassium channels within differentiating axons. This gene encompasses almost 1.5% of chromosome 7 and is one of the largest genes in the human genome. It is directly bound and regulated by forkhead box protein P2, a transcription factor related to speech and language development. This gene has been implicated in multiple neurodevelopmental disorders, including Gilles de la Tourette syndrome, schizophrenia, epilepsy, autism, ADHD and intellectual disability. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2017]

CNTNAP2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.48).

BP6

Variant 7-147132472-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-147132472-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 166910.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=4, Benign=3, Uncertain_significance=2}. Variant chr7-147132472-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr7-147132472-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.867 with no splicing effect.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 4 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CNTNAP2	NM_014141.6 link	c.1311C>T	p.Ile437Ile	synonymous_variant	Exon 8 of 24	ENST00000361727.8	NP_054860.1	Q9UHC6-1A0A090N7T7B2RCH4
CNTNAP2	XM_017011950.3 link	c.1311C>T	p.Ile437Ile	synonymous_variant	Exon 8 of 14		XP_016867439.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
CNTNAP2	ENST00000361727.8 link	c.1311C>T	p.Ile437Ile	synonymous_variant	Exon 8 of 24	1	NM_014141.6	ENSP00000354778.3		Q9UHC6-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00333

AC:

507

AN:

152120

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000483

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00110

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00275

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00290

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00847

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00494

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00191

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00343

AC:

862

AN:

251146

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00364

AC XY:

494

AN XY:

135726

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000492

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000464

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.0000992

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0000544

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00385

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00896

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00449

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00228

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00348

AC:

5082

AN:

1461410

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00370

AC XY:

2688

AN XY:

727010

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000508

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000918

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.000115

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00410

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00974

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00356

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00285

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00332

AC:

506

AN:

152238

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00330

AC XY:

246

AN XY:

74440

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000481

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00268

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00290

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00847

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00494

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00189

Alfa

AF:

0.00401

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00257

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00115

AC:

AN:

3476

EpiCase

AF:

0.00387

EpiControl

AF:

0.00249

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:10

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:4

Mar 03, 2015

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 20, 2017

Athena Diagnostics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 01, 2025

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

CNTNAP2: BP4, BP7 -

not specified

Benign:3

Jul 21, 2016

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jun 01, 2015

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Cortical dysplasia-focal epilepsy syndrome

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Jan 30, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jun 14, 2016

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Pitt-Hopkins-like syndrome

Uncertain:1

Jun 14, 2016

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Inborn genetic diseases

Benign:1

Aug 16, 2016

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

CNTNAP2-related disorder

Benign:1

Jan 05, 2023

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.48

CADD

Benign

9.2

DANN

Benign

0.75

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.010

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over