chr7-150952574-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. The variant received 10 ACMG points: 10P and 0B. PM1PM2PP2PP3_StrongPP5
The NM_000238.4(KCNH2):c.1408A>G(p.Asn470Asp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. 14/23 in silico tools predict a damaging outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Pathogenic (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. N470N) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000238.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- long QT syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- long QT syndrome 2Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, G2P
- short QT syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen
- short QT syndrome type 1Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Ambry Genetics
- Brugada syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE, NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen, Genomics England PanelApp
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Pathogenic. The variant received 10 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KCNH2 | NM_000238.4 | c.1408A>G | p.Asn470Asp | missense_variant | Exon 6 of 15 | ENST00000262186.10 | NP_000229.1 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 34
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Long QT syndrome 2 Pathogenic:1
- -
Congenital long QT syndrome Other:1
This variant has been reported as associated with Long QT syndrome in the following publications (PMID:7889573;PMID:16432067). This is a literature report, and does not necessarily reflect the clinical interpretation of the Imperial College / Royal Brompton Cardiovascular Genetics laboratory. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at