chr7-150974761-A-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 10 ACMG points: 10P and 0B. PM1PM2PM5PP3_Strong
The ENST00000262186.10(KCNH2):c.257T>C(p.Leu86Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. L86R) has been classified as Pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000262186.10 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 10 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KCNH2 | NM_000238.4 | c.257T>C | p.Leu86Pro | missense_variant | 2/15 | ENST00000262186.10 | NP_000229.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KCNH2 | ENST00000262186.10 | c.257T>C | p.Leu86Pro | missense_variant | 2/15 | 1 | NM_000238.4 | ENSP00000262186 | P1 | |
KCNH2 | ENST00000532957.5 | n.480T>C | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 2/9 | 2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 34
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 34
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 34
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Dec 31, 2020 | Reported in one individual referred for LQTS genetic testing; no patient-specific data were described (Kapplinger et al., 2009); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Not observed in large population cohorts (Lek et al., 2016); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 19716085, 25417810, 22581653, 32475984) - |
Long QT syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Mar 01, 2023 | This variant is not present in population databases (gnomAD no frequency). This sequence change replaces leucine, which is neutral and non-polar, with proline, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 86 of the KCNH2 protein (p.Leu86Pro). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with KCNH2-conditions (PMID: 19716085). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 67413). An algorithm developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (PolyPhen-2) suggests that this variant is likely to be disruptive. Experimental studies have shown that this missense change affects KCNH2 function (PMID: 25417810, 32475984). In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Mar 28, 2018 | The c.257T>C (p.L86P) alteration is located in exon 2 (coding exon 2) of the KCNH2 gene. This alteration results from a T to C substitution at nucleotide position 257, causing the leucine (L) at amino acid position 86 to be replaced by a proline (P). Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. - |
Congenital long QT syndrome Other:1
not provided, no classification provided | literature only | Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust | - | This variant has been reported as associated with Long QT syndrome in the following publications (PMID:19716085). This is a literature report, and does not necessarily reflect the clinical interpretation of the Imperial College / Royal Brompton Cardiovascular Genetics laboratory. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at