chr7-41965475-G-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_000168.6(GLI3):​c.3598C>G​(p.His1200Asp) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000716 in 1,609,328 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 14 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00050 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00074 ( 14 hom. )

Consequence

GLI3
NM_000168.6 missense

Scores

1
17

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: 7.09

Publications

7 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
GLI3 (HGNC:4319): (GLI family zinc finger 3) This gene encodes a protein which belongs to the C2H2-type zinc finger proteins subclass of the Gli family. They are characterized as DNA-binding transcription factors and are mediators of Sonic hedgehog (Shh) signaling. The protein encoded by this gene localizes in the cytoplasm and activates patched Drosophila homolog (PTCH) gene expression. It is also thought to play a role during embryogenesis. Mutations in this gene have been associated with several diseases, including Greig cephalopolysyndactyly syndrome, Pallister-Hall syndrome, preaxial polydactyly type IV, and postaxial polydactyly types A1 and B. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
GLI3 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Greig cephalopolysyndactyly syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Genomics England PanelApp, Ambry Genetics, PanelApp Australia
  • Pallister-Hall syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, G2P, Ambry Genetics, Orphanet
  • polydactyly, postaxial, type A1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • polysyndactyly 4
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Orphanet
  • tibial hemimelia
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • acrocallosal syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • postaxial polydactyly type A
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.006214142).
BP6
Variant 7-41965475-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-41965475-G-C is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 360229.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000499 (76/152330) while in subpopulation EAS AF = 0.0109 (56/5160). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00858. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 41 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 14 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
GLI3NM_000168.6 linkc.3598C>G p.His1200Asp missense_variant Exon 15 of 15 ENST00000395925.8 NP_000159.3 P10071

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
GLI3ENST00000395925.8 linkc.3598C>G p.His1200Asp missense_variant Exon 15 of 15 5 NM_000168.6 ENSP00000379258.3 P10071

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000499
AC:
76
AN:
152212
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00173
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0108
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00145
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000882
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00104
AC:
258
AN:
248994
AF XY:
0.00110
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00169
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0104
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000619
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000656
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000739
AC:
1077
AN:
1456998
Hom.:
14
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.000721
AC XY:
522
AN XY:
724170
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
33394
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0000224
AC:
1
AN:
44660
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00211
AC:
55
AN:
26116
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0190
AC:
750
AN:
39574
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00135
AC:
116
AN:
86176
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
51850
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000521
AC:
3
AN:
5758
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000105
AC:
117
AN:
1109364
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000582
AC:
35
AN:
60106
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.486
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
83
166
249
332
415
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000499
AC:
76
AN:
152330
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000550
AC XY:
41
AN XY:
74490
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
41580
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
15306
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00173
AC:
6
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0109
AC:
56
AN:
5160
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00145
AC:
7
AN:
4834
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10630
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000882
AC:
6
AN:
68030
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000473
AC:
1
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.497
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000380
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000431
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ALSPAC
AF:
0.000259
AC:
1
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000116
AC:
1
ExAC
AF:
0.00114
AC:
138
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00404
AC:
14
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000109
EpiControl
AF:
0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:3
Oct 06, 2020
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 25231023, 29345162, 26261006) -

May 31, 2017
Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 01, 2024
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

GLI3: BP4, BS1, BS2 -

Pallister-Hall syndrome;C0265306:Greig cephalopolysyndactyly syndrome Benign:1
Oct 24, 2024
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Greig cephalopolysyndactyly syndrome Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Pallister-Hall syndrome;C0265306:Greig cephalopolysyndactyly syndrome;C1868111:Polysyndactyly 4;C4282400:Polydactyly, postaxial, type A1 Benign:1
May 11, 2022
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Pallister-Hall syndrome Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Polydactyly Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.14
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.44
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.40
CADD
Benign
22
DANN
Benign
0.94
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.30
T;.
Eigen
Benign
-0.13
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.024
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
1.0
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.63
T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0062
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.1
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.6
L;.
PhyloP100
7.1
PrimateAI
Benign
0.37
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.1
N;.
REVEL
Benign
0.22
Sift
Benign
0.071
T;.
Sift4G
Benign
0.34
T;.
Polyphen
0.033
B;.
Vest4
0.76
MVP
0.36
MPC
0.42
ClinPred
0.057
T
GERP RS
5.7
Varity_R
0.13
gMVP
0.19
Mutation Taster
=86/14
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs145069572; hg19: chr7-42005073; COSMIC: COSV67893003; API