chr7-41965955-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4BS2
The NM_000168.6(GLI3):c.3118G>A(p.Glu1040Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000548 in 1,459,012 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000168.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000406 AC: 1AN: 246518Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00000748 AC XY: 1AN XY: 133754
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000548 AC: 8AN: 1459012Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.00000276 AC XY: 2AN XY: 725680
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Pallister-Hall syndrome;C0265306:Greig cephalopolysyndactyly syndrome;C0342418:Hamartoma of hypothalamus;C1868111:Polysyndactyly 4;C4282400:Polydactyly, postaxial, type A1 Uncertain:1
- -
Greig cephalopolysyndactyly syndrome Uncertain:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
not provided Uncertain:1
The E1040K variant has not been published as a pathogenic variant, nor has it been reported as a benign polymorphism to our knowledge. The E1040K variant is a non-conservative amino acid substitution, which is likely to impact secondary protein structure as these residues differ in polarity, charge, size and/or other properties. This substitution occurs at a position that is conserved across species and in silico analysis predicts this variant is probably damaging to the protein structure/function. However, no other missense variants have been reported nearby according to the Human Gene Mutation Database (Stenson et al., 2014). Therefore, based on the currently available information, it is unclear whether this variant is a pathogenic variant or a rare benign variant. -
Polydactyly Uncertain:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Pallister-Hall syndrome Uncertain:1
- -
Pallister-Hall syndrome;C0265306:Greig cephalopolysyndactyly syndrome Benign:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at