chr7-41966238-C-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_000168.6(GLI3):​c.2835G>C​(p.Leu945Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0252 in 1,608,778 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 598 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.018 ( 41 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.026 ( 557 hom. )

Consequence

GLI3
NM_000168.6 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.498

Publications

6 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
GLI3 (HGNC:4319): (GLI family zinc finger 3) This gene encodes a protein which belongs to the C2H2-type zinc finger proteins subclass of the Gli family. They are characterized as DNA-binding transcription factors and are mediators of Sonic hedgehog (Shh) signaling. The protein encoded by this gene localizes in the cytoplasm and activates patched Drosophila homolog (PTCH) gene expression. It is also thought to play a role during embryogenesis. Mutations in this gene have been associated with several diseases, including Greig cephalopolysyndactyly syndrome, Pallister-Hall syndrome, preaxial polydactyly type IV, and postaxial polydactyly types A1 and B. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
GLI3 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Greig cephalopolysyndactyly syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Genomics England PanelApp, Ambry Genetics, PanelApp Australia
  • Pallister-Hall syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, G2P, Ambry Genetics, Orphanet
  • polydactyly, postaxial, type A1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • polysyndactyly 4
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Orphanet
  • tibial hemimelia
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • acrocallosal syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • postaxial polydactyly type A
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.42).
BP6
Variant 7-41966238-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-41966238-C-G is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 194463.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.498 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0184 (2803/152310) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.0272 (1849/68010). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0262. There are 41 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 1272 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 41 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
GLI3NM_000168.6 linkc.2835G>C p.Leu945Leu synonymous_variant Exon 15 of 15 ENST00000395925.8 NP_000159.3 P10071

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
GLI3ENST00000395925.8 linkc.2835G>C p.Leu945Leu synonymous_variant Exon 15 of 15 5 NM_000168.6 ENSP00000379258.3 P10071

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0184
AC:
2802
AN:
152194
Hom.:
41
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00533
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0603
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0175
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0294
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000387
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0130
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0176
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0256
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0272
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0229
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0195
AC:
4548
AN:
232916
AF XY:
0.0205
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00423
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0138
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0317
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000113
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0178
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0263
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0252
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0259
AC:
37684
AN:
1456468
Hom.:
557
Cov.:
35
AF XY:
0.0257
AC XY:
18627
AN XY:
724822
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00452
AC:
151
AN:
33440
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0149
AC:
667
AN:
44620
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0311
AC:
811
AN:
26056
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000151
AC:
6
AN:
39652
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0167
AC:
1436
AN:
86162
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0198
AC:
979
AN:
49536
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0295
AC:
170
AN:
5758
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0288
AC:
32028
AN:
1111036
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0239
AC:
1436
AN:
60208
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.477
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
2429
4858
7287
9716
12145
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
1208
2416
3624
4832
6040
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0184
AC:
2803
AN:
152310
Hom.:
41
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0171
AC XY:
1272
AN XY:
74472
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00531
AC:
221
AN:
41586
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0174
AC:
266
AN:
15310
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0294
AC:
102
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000388
AC:
2
AN:
5158
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0130
AC:
63
AN:
4830
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0176
AC:
187
AN:
10630
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0276
AC:
8
AN:
290
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0272
AC:
1849
AN:
68010
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0236
AC:
50
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.497
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
155
310
464
619
774
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
36
72
108
144
180
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0241
Hom.:
21
Bravo
AF:
0.0186
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0100
AC:
35
AN:
3472
EpiCase
AF:
0.0260
EpiControl
AF:
0.0266

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 20, 2015
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:3
Nov 29, 2023
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 03, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Pallister-Hall syndrome;C0265306:Greig cephalopolysyndactyly syndrome Benign:1
Jan 30, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Greig cephalopolysyndactyly syndrome Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Polydactyly Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Pallister-Hall syndrome Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.42
CADD
Benign
8.1
DANN
Benign
0.74
PhyloP100
0.50
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs61758978; hg19: chr7-42005836; API