chr7-44624372-A-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The NM_002541.4(OGDH):c.29A>G(p.Lys10Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000112 in 1,608,200 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_002541.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- oxoglutaricaciduriaInheritance: AR, Unknown Classification: STRONG, MODERATE, LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_002541.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGDH | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.29A>G | p.Lys10Arg | missense | Exon 2 of 23 | ENSP00000222673.5 | Q02218-1 | ||
| OGDH | TSL:1 | c.29A>G | p.Lys10Arg | missense | Exon 2 of 9 | ENSP00000388084.2 | Q02218-3 | ||
| OGDH | c.29A>G | p.Lys10Arg | missense | Exon 2 of 25 | ENSP00000632404.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000205 AC: 3AN: 146520Hom.: 1 Cov.: 29 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000796 AC: 2AN: 251376 AF XY: 0.00000736 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000103 AC: 15AN: 1461680Hom.: 0 Cov.: 36 AF XY: 0.00000825 AC XY: 6AN XY: 727148 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000205 AC: 3AN: 146520Hom.: 1 Cov.: 29 AF XY: 0.0000423 AC XY: 3AN XY: 70890 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at