chr7-5986901-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points: 2P and 9B. PM1BP4_StrongBP6BS2
The ENST00000265849.12(PMS2):āc.1864A>Gā(p.Met622Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000115 in 1,614,126 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. M622I) has been classified as Benign.
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000265849.12 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PMS2 | NM_000535.7 | c.1864A>G | p.Met622Val | missense_variant | 11/15 | ENST00000265849.12 | NP_000526.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PMS2 | ENST00000265849.12 | c.1864A>G | p.Met622Val | missense_variant | 11/15 | 1 | NM_000535.7 | ENSP00000265849 | P3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000394 AC: 6AN: 152176Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000350 AC: 88AN: 251444Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000441 AC XY: 60AN XY: 135912
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000123 AC: 180AN: 1461832Hom.: 2 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000172 AC XY: 125AN XY: 727222
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000394 AC: 6AN: 152294Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000269 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74472
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Sep 11, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Sep 28, 2017 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Mar 13, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C. | Sep 27, 2022 | - - |
not provided Uncertain:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Mar 24, 2017 | Variant summary: The PMS2 c.1864A>G (p.Met622Val) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. 4/4 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant (SNPs&GO not captured due to low reliability index). This variant was found in the ExAC database in 46/121374 control chromosomes at a frequency of 0.000379, which is approximately 3 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic PMS2 variant (0.0001136), however ExAC does not use technology that is able to differentiate between PMS2 and highly homologous psuedogenes, therefore pseudogene intereference cannot be ruled out. The variant has been reported in affected individuals in the literature, without strong evidence for causality. A functional study suggests the binding of PMS2-M622V to MLH1 was consistently decreased, however quantification was not provided (Plon_2011). The variant was classified by one reputable clinical lab as a VUS, and by another as likely benign. Taken together, until additional functional and clinical data becomes available, this variant is classified as VUS. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 24, 2020 | While protein-based in silico analysis supports that this variant does not alter protein structure/function, splice predictors support a deleterious effect.; Observed in individuals undergoing hereditary cancer panel testing for Lynch syndrome-related cancers and/or polyps (Yurgelun 2015); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 21356188, 11793469, 25980754, 19526325, 16472587) - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | Apr 26, 2022 | BP4 - |
Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Dec 28, 2023 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at