chr7-76302890-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points: 2P and 20B. PM1BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_001540.5(HSPB1):c.178C>T(p.Pro60Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00228 in 1,560,540 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P60R) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001540.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSPB1 | NM_001540.5 | c.178C>T | p.Pro60Ser | missense_variant | 1/3 | ENST00000248553.7 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSPB1 | ENST00000248553.7 | c.178C>T | p.Pro60Ser | missense_variant | 1/3 | 1 | NM_001540.5 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00145 AC: 221AN: 152218Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00154 AC: 252AN: 164092Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.00158 AC XY: 144AN XY: 90992
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00237 AC: 3335AN: 1408204Hom.: 5 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00234 AC XY: 1628AN XY: 697212
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00145 AC: 221AN: 152336Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00137 AC XY: 102AN XY: 74482
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | May 07, 2019 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Aug 01, 2023 | HSPB1: BS1 - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Sep 01, 2023 | - - |
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Dec 18, 2020 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Jun 16, 2016 | - - |
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease axonal type 2F Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 18, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | May 22, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Molecular Genetics Laboratory, London Health Sciences Centre | - | - - |
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Sep 20, 2019 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Neuronopathy, distal hereditary motor, type 2B Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | May 22, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at