chr7-80646139-A-C
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_001001548.3(CD36):c.-132A>C variant causes a 5 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.497 in 153,858 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 19,521 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.50 ( 19285 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.49 ( 236 hom. )
Consequence
CD36
NM_001001548.3 5_prime_UTR
NM_001001548.3 5_prime_UTR
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.283
Genes affected
CD36 (HGNC:1663): (CD36 molecule (CD36 blood group)) The protein encoded by this gene is the fourth major glycoprotein of the platelet surface and serves as a receptor for thrombospondin in platelets and various cell lines. Since thrombospondins are widely distributed proteins involved in a variety of adhesive processes, this protein may have important functions as a cell adhesion molecule. It binds to collagen, thrombospondin, anionic phospholipids and oxidized LDL. It directly mediates cytoadherence of Plasmodium falciparum parasitized erythrocytes and it binds long chain fatty acids and may function in the transport and/or as a regulator of fatty acid transport. Mutations in this gene cause platelet glycoprotein deficiency. Multiple alternatively spliced transcript variants have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2014]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.68).
BP6
Variant 7-80646139-A-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-80646139-A-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 360748.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.548 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CD36 | NM_001001548.3 | c.-132A>C | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 2/15 | ENST00000447544.7 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CD36 | ENST00000447544.7 | c.-132A>C | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 2/15 | 5 | NM_001001548.3 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.497 AC: 75478AN: 151874Hom.: 19273 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
75478
AN:
151874
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.488 AC: 910AN: 1866Hom.: 236 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.475 AC XY: 478AN XY: 1006
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
910
AN:
1866
Hom.:
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
AC XY:
478
AN XY:
1006
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.497 AC: 75519AN: 151992Hom.: 19285 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.493 AC XY: 36615AN XY: 74264
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
75519
AN:
151992
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
36615
AN XY:
74264
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
1060
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Platelet-type bleeding disorder 10 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at