chr8-103371672-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 1P and 3B. PP2BP4_ModerateBS2_Supporting
The NM_138455.4(CTHRC1):c.16C>T(p.Pro6Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000652 in 1,534,040 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_138455.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- Barrett esophagusInheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_138455.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTHRC1 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.16C>T | p.Pro6Ser | missense | Exon 1 of 4 | ENSP00000330523.5 | Q96CG8-1 | ||
| CTHRC1 | c.16C>T | p.Pro6Ser | missense | Exon 1 of 4 | ENSP00000561074.1 | ||||
| CTHRC1 | TSL:2 | c.16C>T | p.Pro6Ser | missense | Exon 1 of 2 | ENSP00000416045.2 | E7EVQ5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152184Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000579 AC: 8AN: 1381740Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000881 AC XY: 6AN XY: 681130 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152300Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000134 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74488 show subpopulations ⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Genomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at