chr8-142913286-G-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_000498.3(CYP11B2):​c.1120C>A​(p.Arg374Arg) variant causes a splice region, synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.569 in 1,610,144 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 263,098 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. R374R) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.55 ( 23124 hom., cov: 29)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.57 ( 239974 hom. )

Consequence

CYP11B2
NM_000498.3 splice_region, synonymous

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.0001083
2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:12

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.01

Publications

24 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
CYP11B2 (HGNC:2592): (cytochrome P450 family 11 subfamily B member 2) This gene encodes a member of the cytochrome P450 superfamily of enzymes. The cytochrome P450 proteins are monooxygenases which catalyze many reactions involved in drug metabolism and synthesis of cholesterol, steroids and other lipids. This protein localizes to the mitochondrial inner membrane. The enzyme has steroid 18-hydroxylase activity to synthesize aldosterone and 18-oxocortisol as well as steroid 11 beta-hydroxylase activity. Mutations in this gene cause corticosterone methyl oxidase deficiency. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
GML (HGNC:4375): (glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchored molecule like) Predicted to be involved in DNA damage response, signal transduction by p53 class mediator resulting in cell cycle arrest; apoptotic process; and negative regulation of cell population proliferation. Predicted to be extrinsic component of membrane. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.6).
BP6
Variant 8-142913286-G-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr8-142913286-G-T is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 362195.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.01 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.778 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
CYP11B2NM_000498.3 linkc.1120C>A p.Arg374Arg splice_region_variant, synonymous_variant Exon 6 of 9 ENST00000323110.2 NP_000489.3 P19099

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CYP11B2ENST00000323110.2 linkc.1120C>A p.Arg374Arg splice_region_variant, synonymous_variant Exon 6 of 9 1 NM_000498.3 ENSP00000325822.2 P19099
GMLENST00000522728.5 linkc.182-677G>T intron_variant Intron 3 of 4 3 ENSP00000430799.1 E5RI31

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.554
AC:
82848
AN:
149446
Hom.:
23113
Cov.:
29
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.476
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.552
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.597
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.641
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.800
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.651
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.599
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.627
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.554
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.581
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.600
AC:
148144
AN:
247034
AF XY:
0.603
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.488
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.608
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.643
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.805
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.620
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.556
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.588
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.571
AC:
833445
AN:
1460576
Hom.:
239974
Cov.:
62
AF XY:
0.574
AC XY:
417045
AN XY:
726610
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.484
AC:
16192
AN:
33450
American (AMR)
AF:
0.604
AC:
26969
AN:
44682
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.645
AC:
16851
AN:
26114
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.808
AC:
32059
AN:
39682
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.664
AC:
57246
AN:
86222
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.616
AC:
32468
AN:
52702
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.643
AC:
3690
AN:
5740
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.551
AC:
612666
AN:
1111640
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.585
AC:
35304
AN:
60344
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.468
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
21323
42646
63968
85291
106614
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
17384
34768
52152
69536
86920
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.554
AC:
82890
AN:
149568
Hom.:
23124
Cov.:
29
AF XY:
0.562
AC XY:
41032
AN XY:
72974
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.476
AC:
19203
AN:
40342
American (AMR)
AF:
0.598
AC:
9051
AN:
15144
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.641
AC:
2210
AN:
3450
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.799
AC:
3923
AN:
4912
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.652
AC:
3028
AN:
4644
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.599
AC:
6252
AN:
10430
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.627
AC:
183
AN:
292
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.554
AC:
37346
AN:
67384
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.578
AC:
1195
AN:
2066
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.476
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1599
3197
4796
6394
7993
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
716
1432
2148
2864
3580
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.556
Hom.:
10355
Bravo
AF:
0.553
EpiCase
AF:
0.562
EpiControl
AF:
0.569

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:12
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 21, 2016
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

p.Arg374Arg in exon 6 of CYP11B2: This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it has been identified in 80.16% (6876/8578) of East Asian chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitut e.org; dbSNP rs4538). -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Corticosterone methyloxidase type 2 deficiency Benign:2
Mar 06, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Jul 01, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Corticosterone 18-monooxygenase deficiency Benign:2
Mar 06, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Jul 01, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Corticosterone methyl oxidase type II deficiency Benign:1
Sep 16, 2020
Natera, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Glucocorticoid-remediable aldosteronism Benign:1
Mar 06, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.60
CADD
Benign
6.2
DANN
Benign
0.64
PhyloP100
1.0
Mutation Taster
=70/30
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.00011
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.050
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs4538; hg19: chr8-143994702; COSMIC: COSV59996516; API