chr8-18062391-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. The variant received 7 ACMG points: 7P and 0B. PM1PM2PP3_ModeratePP5
The NM_177924.5(ASAH1):c.536C>T(p.Thr179Ile) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000684 in 1,461,848 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_177924.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- ASAH1-related sphingolipidosisInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- Farber lipogranulomatosisInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp
- spinal muscular atrophy-progressive myoclonic epilepsy syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp, G2P
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_pathogenic. The variant received 7 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_177924.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASAH1 | NM_177924.5 | MANE Select | c.536C>T | p.Thr179Ile | missense | Exon 8 of 14 | NP_808592.2 | ||
| ASAH1 | NM_004315.6 | c.584C>T | p.Thr195Ile | missense | Exon 8 of 14 | NP_004306.3 | |||
| ASAH1 | NM_001127505.3 | c.518C>T | p.Thr173Ile | missense | Exon 8 of 14 | NP_001120977.1 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASAH1 | ENST00000637790.2 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.536C>T | p.Thr179Ile | missense | Exon 8 of 14 | ENSP00000490272.1 | ||
| ASAH1 | ENST00000381733.9 | TSL:1 | c.584C>T | p.Thr195Ile | missense | Exon 8 of 14 | ENSP00000371152.4 | ||
| ASAH1 | ENST00000314146.10 | TSL:1 | c.518C>T | p.Thr173Ile | missense | Exon 8 of 14 | ENSP00000326970.10 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000796 AC: 2AN: 251406 AF XY: 0.00 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.84e-7 AC: 1AN: 1461848Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 727218 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Spinal muscular atrophy-progressive myoclonic epilepsy syndrome Pathogenic:1Uncertain:1
Likely pathogenicity based on finding it in trans with another missense mutation in a 14-year-old female with progressive cognitive impairment, flaccid proximal limb weakness with childhood onset, hyperreflexia, seizure disorder, dystonia, myoclonus, mild cerebral atrophy.
It is our recommendation to update the status of variant c.536C>T from VUS to pathogenic due to recent publications discussing the pathogenicity of this variant. Multiple patients have been diagnosed with SMA-PME who carry the c.546C>T variant. In Sathe et al., 2014, DOI: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2013.12.226, the patient presented with SMA-PME according to Gene Reviews (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK488189/). Compound heterozygous variants, c.536C>T and c.125A>G, were identified in the patient using whole genome sequencing. Variant c.536C>T has been identified in an additional unrelated patients diagnosed with SMA-PME including a patient listed in Clinvar and identified at Baylor College of Medicine (SCV000807360.1) and 1 patient published in Cozma et al., 2017, DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-06604-2. Ceramide biomarker analysis in this patient (Cozma et al., 2017) along with 9 additional Farber disease patients and 2 SMA-PME patients demonstrated that C26:0 levels were significantly higher in Farber patients and SMA-PME patients compared to controls.
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at