Genetic Variant NAT1:c.-6-30A>T (chr8-18222012-A-T) – ACMG Classification: Benign (-12 pts)

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBA1

The NM_000662.8(NAT1):c.-6-30A>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00296 in 1,569,658 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 132 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. There are indicators that this mutation may affect the branch point..

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.016 ( 67 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0016 ( 65 hom. )

Consequence

NAT1
NM_000662.8 intron

Scores

Clinical Significance

Not reported in ClinVar

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.307

Publications

4 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

NAT1 (HGNC:7645): (N-acetyltransferase 1) This gene is one of two arylamine N-acetyltransferase (NAT) genes in the human genome, and is orthologous to the mouse and rat Nat2 genes. The enzyme encoded by this gene catalyzes the transfer of an acetyl group from acetyl-CoA to various arylamine and hydrazine substrates. This enzyme helps metabolize drugs and other xenobiotics, and functions in folate catabolism. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2011]

NAT1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.

BP4

This position, referring to a specific DNA site, is a probable branch point but is likely benign (scored 3 / 10, using the threshold of <=3). The score ranges from 0 to 10, with values ≤3 considered benign and >5 classified as pathogenic. Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.85).

BA1

GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0542 is higher than 0.05.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000662.8. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein
NAT1	NM_000662.8	MANE Select	c.-6-30A>T	intron	N/A	NP_000653.3
NAT1	NM_001160174.3		c.-36A>T	5_prime_UTR	Exon 1 of 1	NP_001153646.1
NAT1	NM_001160175.4		c.181-30A>T	intron	N/A	NP_001153647.1

Ensembl Transcripts

Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein
NAT1	ENST00000307719.9	TSL:1 MANE Select	c.-6-30A>T	intron	N/A	ENSP00000307218.4
NAT1	ENST00000518029.5	TSL:1	c.-6-30A>T	intron	N/A	ENSP00000428270.1
NAT1	ENST00000519006.5	TSL:1	n.522-30A>T	intron	N/A

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0159

AC:

2419

AN:

152168

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0563

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00419

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000441

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00908

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00439

AC:

958

AN:

218154

AF XY:

0.00304

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0554

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00270

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000488

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00174

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00157

AC:

2230

AN:

1417372

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00136

AC XY:

956

AN XY:

700712

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0596

AC:

1895

AN:

31814

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00304

AC:

115

AN:

37828

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

23290

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39292

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000115

AC:

AN:

78202

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

51902

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000730

AC:

AN:

5478

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000238

AC:

AN:

1091084

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00309

AC:

181

AN:

58482

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.491

Heterozygous variant carriers

100

200

299

399

499

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

128

192

256

320

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0159

AC:

2416

AN:

152286

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0150

AC XY:

1119

AN XY:

74472

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0561

AC:

2330

AN:

41544

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00412

AC:

AN:

15304

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5190

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000207

AC:

AN:

4830

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10608

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000441

AC:

AN:

68020

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00899

AC:

AN:

2114

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.499

Heterozygous variant carriers

115

231

346

462

577

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

120

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00769

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0178

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00202

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Not reported in ClinVar

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.85

CADD

Benign

6.5

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.80

PhyloP100

0.31

La Branchor

0.36

BranchPoint Hunter

3.0

PromoterAI

0.031

Neutral

(source)

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism (auto)

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Variant Effect in Transcripts

RefSeq Transcripts

Ensembl Transcripts

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over