chr8-18400478-T-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PP3_ModerateBS2
The NM_000015.3(NAT2):c.475T>A(p.Trp159Arg) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000682 in 1,613,870 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000015.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000015.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NAT2 | NM_000015.3 | MANE Select | c.475T>A | p.Trp159Arg | missense | Exon 2 of 2 | NP_000006.2 | P11245 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NAT2 | ENST00000286479.4 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.475T>A | p.Trp159Arg | missense | Exon 2 of 2 | ENSP00000286479.3 | P11245 | |
| NAT2 | ENST00000893781.1 | c.475T>A | p.Trp159Arg | missense | Exon 3 of 3 | ENSP00000563840.1 | |||
| NAT2 | ENST00000893782.1 | c.475T>A | p.Trp159Arg | missense | Exon 3 of 3 | ENSP00000563841.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000329 AC: 5AN: 151990Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000399 AC: 1AN: 250836 AF XY: 0.00 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000410 AC: 6AN: 1461762Hom.: 0 Cov.: 57 AF XY: 0.00000413 AC XY: 3AN XY: 727180 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000329 AC: 5AN: 152108Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.0000269 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74370 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at