Menu
GeneBe

chr8-22130798-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points: 2P and 3B. PM2BP4_ModerateBS1_Supporting

The NM_005144.5(HR):​c.-411C>T variant causes a 5 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000506 in 152,148 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00051 ( 0 hom., cov: 34)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0 ( 0 hom. )
Failed GnomAD Quality Control

Consequence

HR
NM_005144.5 5_prime_UTR

Scores

1
1

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, single submitter U:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0110
Variant links:
Genes affected
HRURF (HGNC:55085): (HR upstream open reading frame) Implicated in hypotrichosis 4. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]
HR (HGNC:5172): (HR lysine demethylase and nuclear receptor corepressor) This gene encodes a protein that is involved in hair growth. This protein functions as a transcriptional corepressor of multiple nuclear receptors, including thyroid hormone receptor, the retinoic acid receptor-related orphan receptors and the vitamin D receptors, and it interacts with histone deacetylases. The translation of this protein is modulated by a regulatory open reading frame (ORF) that exists upstream of the primary ORF. Mutations in this upstream ORF cause Marie Unna hereditary hypotrichosis (MUHH), an autosomal dominant form of genetic hair loss. Mutations in this gene also cause autosomal recessive congenital alopecia and atrichia with papular lesions, other diseases resulting in hair loss. Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2014]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points.

PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.41).
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000506 (77/152148) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.00332 (16/4824). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00208. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 47 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 34. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
HRURFNM_001394132.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.-90C>T 5_prime_UTR_variant 1/1 ENST00000518377.3
HRNM_005144.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.-411C>T 5_prime_UTR_variant 1/19 ENST00000381418.9
HRNM_018411.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.-411C>T 5_prime_UTR_variant 1/18

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
HRENST00000381418.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.-411C>T 5_prime_UTR_variant 1/191 NM_005144.5 P1O43593-1
HRURFENST00000518377.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.-90C>T 5_prime_UTR_variant 1/14 NM_001394132.1 P1
HRENST00000312841.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.-411C>T 5_prime_UTR_variant 1/185 O43593-2
HRENST00000680789.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.-411C>T 5_prime_UTR_variant 2/20 P1O43593-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000506
AC:
77
AN:
152028
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
34
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000169
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00439
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000327
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000194
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00332
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000633
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD4 exome
Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AC0
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
96
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
0.00
AC XY:
0
AN XY:
82
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000506
AC:
77
AN:
152148
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.000632
AC XY:
47
AN XY:
74392
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000169
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000327
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000194
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00332
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000633
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000473
Alfa
AF:
0.000347
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000510

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Atrichia with papular lesions Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Alopecia universalis congenita Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.41
CADD
Benign
21
DANN
Uncertain
0.98

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs541887689; hg19: chr8-21988311; API