chr8-38413948-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_023110.3(FGFR1):​c.2262G>A​(p.Leu754Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00957 in 1,614,082 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 101 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0070 ( 6 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0098 ( 95 hom. )

Consequence

FGFR1
NM_023110.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.243
Variant links:
Genes affected
FGFR1 (HGNC:3688): (fibroblast growth factor receptor 1) The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) family, where amino acid sequence is highly conserved between members and throughout evolution. FGFR family members differ from one another in their ligand affinities and tissue distribution. A full-length representative protein consists of an extracellular region, composed of three immunoglobulin-like domains, a single hydrophobic membrane-spanning segment and a cytoplasmic tyrosine kinase domain. The extracellular portion of the protein interacts with fibroblast growth factors, setting in motion a cascade of downstream signals, ultimately influencing mitogenesis and differentiation. This particular family member binds both acidic and basic fibroblast growth factors and is involved in limb induction. Mutations in this gene have been associated with Pfeiffer syndrome, Jackson-Weiss syndrome, Antley-Bixler syndrome, osteoglophonic dysplasia, and autosomal dominant Kallmann syndrome 2. Chromosomal aberrations involving this gene are associated with stem cell myeloproliferative disorder and stem cell leukemia lymphoma syndrome. Alternatively spliced variants which encode different protein isoforms have been described; however, not all variants have been fully characterized. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.53).
BP6
Variant 8-38413948-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr8-38413948-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 362893.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr8-38413948-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.243 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00705 (1073/152262) while in subpopulation AMR AF= 0.0141 (215/15300). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0125. There are 6 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 476 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 6 SM gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
FGFR1NM_023110.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.2262G>A p.Leu754Leu synonymous_variant 17/18 ENST00000447712.7 NP_075598.2 P11362-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
FGFR1ENST00000447712.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.2262G>A p.Leu754Leu synonymous_variant 17/181 NM_023110.3 ENSP00000400162.2 P11362-1
FGFR1ENST00000397091.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.2256G>A p.Leu752Leu synonymous_variant 17/181 ENSP00000380280.5 P11362-7
FGFR1ENST00000397108.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.2256G>A p.Leu752Leu synonymous_variant 18/191 ENSP00000380297.4 P11362-7
FGFR1ENST00000397113.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.2256G>A p.Leu752Leu synonymous_variant 17/182 ENSP00000380302.2 P11362-7
FGFR1ENST00000356207.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.1995G>A p.Leu665Leu synonymous_variant 16/171 ENSP00000348537.5 P11362-3
FGFR1ENST00000397103.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.1995G>A p.Leu665Leu synonymous_variant 15/165 ENSP00000380292.1 E7EU09
FGFR1ENST00000326324.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.1989G>A p.Leu663Leu synonymous_variant 16/171 ENSP00000327229.6 P11362-14

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00705
AC:
1073
AN:
152144
Hom.:
6
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00265
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00219
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0141
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00691
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000848
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0101
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0129
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00668
AC:
1670
AN:
250176
Hom.:
14
AF XY:
0.00655
AC XY:
887
AN XY:
135464
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00188
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0103
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00676
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000327
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000977
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0100
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00951
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00983
AC:
14367
AN:
1461820
Hom.:
95
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00946
AC XY:
6877
AN XY:
727210
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00179
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0112
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00635
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000252
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000580
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00131
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0117
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00901
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00705
AC:
1073
AN:
152262
Hom.:
6
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00639
AC XY:
476
AN XY:
74442
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00265
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0141
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00691
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.000848
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0101
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0128
Alfa
AF:
0.00870
Hom.:
3
Bravo
AF:
0.00859
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000577
AC:
2
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0111
EpiControl
AF:
0.0128

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 03, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesNov 28, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsAug 30, 2018- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenSep 01, 2024FGFR1: BP4, BP7, BS1, BS2 -
Trigonocephaly 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Hypogonadotropic hypogonadism 2 with or without anosmia Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Pfeiffer syndrome;C0406612:Encephalocraniocutaneous lipomatosis;C0432122:Trigonocephaly 1;C0432283:Osteoglophonic dysplasia;C0795998:Jackson-Weiss syndrome;C1563720:Hypogonadotropic hypogonadism 2 with or without anosmia;C1845146:Hartsfield-Bixler-Demyer syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingFulgent Genetics, Fulgent GeneticsJul 15, 2021- -
Osteoglophonic dysplasia Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Pfeiffer syndrome;C1563720:Hypogonadotropic hypogonadism 2 with or without anosmia Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 30, 2024- -
Craniosynostosis syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.53
CADD
Benign
11
DANN
Benign
0.86
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs56341011; hg19: chr8-38271466; COSMIC: COSV58336989; COSMIC: COSV58336989; API