chr8-86628939-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 11 ACMG points: 11P and 0B. PVS1PM2PP5
The ENST00000320005.6(CNGB3):c.1460G>A(p.Trp487Ter) variant causes a stop gained change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000124 in 1,613,706 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Pathogenic (no stars). Variant results in nonsense mediated mRNA decay.
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000320005.6 stop_gained
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 11 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNGB3 | NM_019098.5 | c.1460G>A | p.Trp487Ter | stop_gained | 12/18 | ENST00000320005.6 | NP_061971.3 | |
CNGB3 | XM_011517138.3 | c.1046G>A | p.Trp349Ter | stop_gained | 10/16 | XP_011515440.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNGB3 | ENST00000320005.6 | c.1460G>A | p.Trp487Ter | stop_gained | 12/18 | 1 | NM_019098.5 | ENSP00000316605 | P1 | |
CNGB3 | ENST00000681546.1 | n.1280G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 7/13 | ||||||
CNGB3 | ENST00000681746.1 | c.1460G>A | p.Trp487Ter | stop_gained, NMD_transcript_variant | 12/19 | ENSP00000505959 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000658 AC: 1AN: 152076Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.84e-7 AC: 1AN: 1461630Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00000138 AC XY: 1AN XY: 727118
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000658 AC: 1AN: 152076Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000135 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74300
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Achromatopsia 3 Pathogenic:1
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided | research | Molecular Genetics Laboratory, Institute for Ophthalmic Research | Mar 27, 2017 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at