chr8-86647865-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. Variant got 7 ACMG points: 7P and 0B. PM2PP3_StrongPP5
The ENST00000320005.6(CNGB3):c.926C>T(p.Pro309Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000692 in 1,445,034 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Pathogenic (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. P309P) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000320005.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_pathogenic. Variant got 7 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNGB3 | NM_019098.5 | c.926C>T | p.Pro309Leu | missense_variant | 8/18 | ENST00000320005.6 | NP_061971.3 | |
CNGB3 | XM_011517138.3 | c.512C>T | p.Pro171Leu | missense_variant | 6/16 | XP_011515440.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNGB3 | ENST00000320005.6 | c.926C>T | p.Pro309Leu | missense_variant | 8/18 | 1 | NM_019098.5 | ENSP00000316605 | P1 | |
CNGB3 | ENST00000681546.1 | n.746C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 3/13 | ||||||
CNGB3 | ENST00000681746.1 | c.926C>T | p.Pro309Leu | missense_variant, NMD_transcript_variant | 8/19 | ENSP00000505959 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.92e-7 AC: 1AN: 1445034Hom.: 0 Cov.: 27 AF XY: 0.00000139 AC XY: 1AN XY: 719664
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Achromatopsia 3 Pathogenic:1
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided | research | Molecular Genetics Laboratory, Institute for Ophthalmic Research | Mar 27, 2017 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at