chr8-86668055-G-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 2 ACMG points: 4P and 2B. PM2PM5BP4_Moderate
The ENST00000320005.6(CNGB3):āc.607C>Gā(p.Arg203Gly) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000658 in 151,940 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R203Q) has been classified as Benign.
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000320005.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNGB3 | NM_019098.5 | c.607C>G | p.Arg203Gly | missense_variant | 5/18 | ENST00000320005.6 | NP_061971.3 | |
CNGB3 | XM_011517138.3 | c.193C>G | p.Arg65Gly | missense_variant | 3/16 | XP_011515440.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNGB3 | ENST00000320005.6 | c.607C>G | p.Arg203Gly | missense_variant | 5/18 | 1 | NM_019098.5 | ENSP00000316605.5 | ||
CNGB3 | ENST00000681746.1 | n.607C>G | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 5/19 | ENSP00000505959.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000659 AC: 1AN: 151824Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000398 AC: 1AN: 251414Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00000736 AC XY: 1AN XY: 135872
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000658 AC: 1AN: 151940Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000135 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74216
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at