chr8-89958760-G-A

Position:

• chr8-89958760-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4_Strong BP6 BP7

The NM_002485.5(NBN):​c.1089C>T​(p.Tyr363=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000166 in 1,613,950 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.000033 (0 hom., cov: 32)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.00018 (0 hom.)
• Consequence: NBN NM_002485.5 synonymous
• Clinical Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2 B:9
• Conservation: PhyloP100: -0.844

Genes affected

NBN (HGNC:7652): (nibrin) Mutations in this gene are associated with Nijmegen breakage syndrome, an autosomal recessive chromosomal instability syndrome characterized by microcephaly, growth retardation, immunodeficiency, and cancer predisposition. The encoded protein is a member of the MRE11/RAD50 double-strand break repair complex which consists of 5 proteins. This gene product is thought to be involved in DNA double-strand break repair and DNA damage-induced checkpoint activation. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.87).
• BP6: Variant 8-89958760-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr8-89958760-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 182706.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=7, Uncertain_significance=2, Benign=1}.
• BP7: Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.844 with no splicing effect.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	UniProt
NBN	NM_002485.5	c.1089C>T	p.Tyr363=	synonymous_variant	9/16	ENST00000265433.8

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Appris	UniProt
NBN	ENST00000265433.8	c.1089C>T	p.Tyr363=	synonymous_variant	9/16	1	NM_002485.5	P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000329 AC: 5 AN: 152184 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.0000241

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.00

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.0000588

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.00

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000517 AC: 13 AN: 251406 Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000515 AC XY: 7 AN XY: 135862

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.000369

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.0000616

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.00

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000180 AC: 263 AN: 1461766 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000175 AC XY: 127 AN XY: 727190

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.000179

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.000224

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.000132

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000329 AC: 5 AN: 152184 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000403 AC XY: 3 AN XY: 74352

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.0000241

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.0000588

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.00

Alfa AF: 0.000131 Hom.: 0

Bravo AF: 0.0000718

EpiCase AF: 0.00

EpiControl AF: 0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:2 Benign:9

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

Submissions by phenotype

Microcephaly, normal intelligence and immunodeficiency Uncertain:1 Benign:3

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Genome-Nilou Lab	Nov 07, 2021	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp	Dec 31, 2023	- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Natera, Inc.	Feb 14, 2020	- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina	Apr 27, 2017	This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

not specified Benign:4

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences	-	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	Oct 06, 2014	This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp	Aug 29, 2019	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago	Dec 27, 2019	- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	curation	Sema4, Sema4	Jul 22, 2021	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Ambry Genetics	Jun 18, 2015	This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

not provided Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Apr 10, 2015

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.87
CADD	Benign	0.55
DANN	Benign	0.25

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs121908974; hg19: chr8-90970988; COSMIC: COSV55372844;