chr8-93804836-T-C

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_153704.6(TMEM67):c.2397T>C(p.Asp799Asp) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0165 in 1,604,908 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 275 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.013 ( 19 hom., cov: 30)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.017 ( 256 hom. )

Consequence

TMEM67
NM_153704.6 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:1B:13

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.853

Publications

7 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

TMEM67 (HGNC:28396): (transmembrane protein 67) The protein encoded by this gene localizes to the primary cilium and to the plasma membrane. The gene functions in centriole migration to the apical membrane and formation of the primary cilium. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. Defects in this gene are a cause of Meckel syndrome type 3 (MKS3) and Joubert syndrome type 6 (JBTS6). [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2008]

TMEM67 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

ciliopathy
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
COACH syndrome 1
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P
Meckel syndrome, type 3
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
nephronophthisis 11
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
COACH syndrome 1
Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Ambry Genetics
Joubert syndrome 6
Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Joubert syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Meckel syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Senior-Boichis syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

TMEM67 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.49).

BP6

Variant 8-93804836-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr8-93804836-T-C is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 126304.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.853 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0126 (1924/152206) while in subpopulation SAS AF = 0.0199 (96/4822). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0178. There are 19 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 945 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 30. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 19 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
TMEM67	NM_153704.6 link	c.2397T>C	p.Asp799Asp	synonymous_variant	Exon 23 of 28	ENST00000453321.8	NP_714915.3	Q5HYA8

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
TMEM67	ENST00000453321.8 link	c.2397T>C	p.Asp799Asp	synonymous_variant	Exon 23 of 28	1	NM_153704.6	ENSP00000389998.3		Q5HYA8

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0127

AC:

1924

AN:

152088

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00292

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.0127

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.0107

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.000771

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.0199

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.0168

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00316

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0187

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.0115

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.0153

AC:

3851

AN:

251028

AF XY:

0.0165

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00295

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00843

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.0101

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.000109

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.0138

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0203

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.0154

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0169

AC:

24509

AN:

1452702

Hom.:

256

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0171

AC XY:

12367

AN XY:

723304

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00198

AC:

AN:

33294

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00824

AC:

368

AN:

44676

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00948

AC:

247

AN:

26060

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.0000758

AC:

AN:

39552

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0226

AC:

1946

AN:

86046

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.0142

AC:

756

AN:

53356

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.0151

AC:

AN:

5744

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0182

AC:

20077

AN:

1103880

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.0160

AC:

959

AN:

60094

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.466

Heterozygous variant carriers

1007

2014

3022

4029

5036

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

724

1448

2172

2896

3620

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0126

AC:

1924

AN:

152206

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0127

AC XY:

945

AN XY:

74414

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00291

AC:

121

AN:

41534

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0127

AC:

194

AN:

15286

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.0107

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.000772

AC:

AN:

5178

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0199

AC:

AN:

4822

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.0168

AC:

178

AN:

10576

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00340

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0187

AC:

1269

AN:

68018

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.0113

AC:

AN:

2116

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.502

Heterozygous variant carriers

197

295

394

492

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

104

130

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.0172

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0116

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00866

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.0201

EpiControl

AF:

0.0198

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:13

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:4

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:not provided

- -

Jun 01, 2025

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

TMEM67: BP4, BP7, BS1, BS2 -

Mar 03, 2015

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 29127258) -

not specified

Benign:3

May 07, 2013

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Bardet-Biedl syndrome 14

Uncertain:1

Tolun Lab, Human Genetics Laboratory, Bogazici University

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:research

- -

Meckel syndrome, type 3

Benign:1

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -

Kidney disorder

Benign:1

Sep 07, 2022

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nephronophthisis 11

Benign:1

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Meckel syndrome, type 3;C1853153:Joubert syndrome 6;C1865794:RHYNS syndrome;C2673874:Bardet-Biedl syndrome 14;C3150796:Nephronophthisis 11;C5435651:COACH syndrome 1

Benign:1

Oct 08, 2021

Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Joubert syndrome 6

Benign:1

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Meckel-Gruber syndrome;C0431399:Joubert syndrome

Benign:1

Feb 03, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.49

CADD

Benign

8.1

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.60

PhyloP100

0.85

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism (auto)

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over