chr8-93804836-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_153704.6(TMEM67):​c.2397T>C​(p.Asp799Asp) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0165 in 1,604,908 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 275 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.013 ( 19 hom., cov: 30)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.017 ( 256 hom. )

Consequence

TMEM67
NM_153704.6 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:1B:13

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.853
Variant links:
Genes affected
TMEM67 (HGNC:28396): (transmembrane protein 67) The protein encoded by this gene localizes to the primary cilium and to the plasma membrane. The gene functions in centriole migration to the apical membrane and formation of the primary cilium. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. Defects in this gene are a cause of Meckel syndrome type 3 (MKS3) and Joubert syndrome type 6 (JBTS6). [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.49).
BP6
Variant 8-93804836-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr8-93804836-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 126304.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr8-93804836-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr8-93804836-T-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr8-93804836-T-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_pathogenic].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.853 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0126 (1924/152206) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.0199 (96/4822). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0178. There are 19 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 945 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 30. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 19 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
TMEM67NM_153704.6 linkc.2397T>C p.Asp799Asp synonymous_variant Exon 23 of 28 ENST00000453321.8 NP_714915.3 Q5HYA8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
TMEM67ENST00000453321.8 linkc.2397T>C p.Asp799Asp synonymous_variant Exon 23 of 28 1 NM_153704.6 ENSP00000389998.3 Q5HYA8

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0127
AC:
1924
AN:
152088
Hom.:
19
Cov.:
30
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00292
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0127
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0107
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000771
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0199
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0168
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0187
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0115
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0153
AC:
3851
AN:
251028
Hom.:
37
AF XY:
0.0165
AC XY:
2245
AN XY:
135712
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00295
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00843
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0101
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000109
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0234
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0138
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0203
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0154
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0169
AC:
24509
AN:
1452702
Hom.:
256
Cov.:
27
AF XY:
0.0171
AC XY:
12367
AN XY:
723304
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00198
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00824
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00948
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000758
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0226
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0142
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0182
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0160
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0126
AC:
1924
AN:
152206
Hom.:
19
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.0127
AC XY:
945
AN XY:
74414
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00291
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0127
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0107
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000772
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.0199
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0168
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0187
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0113
Alfa
AF:
0.0158
Hom.:
15
Bravo
AF:
0.0116
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00866
AC:
30
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0201
EpiControl
AF:
0.0198

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:13
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:4
-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 03, 2015
GeneDx
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 29127258) -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: not provided

- -

Mar 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

TMEM67: BP4, BP7, BS1, BS2 -

not specified Benign:3
May 07, 2013
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Bardet-Biedl syndrome 14 Uncertain:1
-
Tolun Lab, Human Genetics Laboratory, Bogazici University
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: research

- -

Meckel syndrome, type 3 Benign:1
Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -

Meckel-Gruber syndrome;C0431399:Familial aplasia of the vermis Benign:1
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Kidney disorder Benign:1
Sep 07, 2022
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nephronophthisis 11 Benign:1
Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -

Meckel syndrome, type 3;C1853153:Joubert syndrome 6;C1865794:RHYNS syndrome;C2673874:Bardet-Biedl syndrome 14;C3150796:Nephronophthisis 11;C5435651:COACH syndrome 1 Benign:1
Oct 08, 2021
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Joubert syndrome 6 Benign:1
Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.49
CADD
Benign
8.1
DANN
Benign
0.60

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs117195541; hg19: chr8-94817064; API