chr9-108902935-A-C
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_003640.5(ELP1):āc.1758T>Gā(p.Pro586=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0147 in 1,613,206 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 388 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Genomes: š 0.0095 ( 10 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š: 0.015 ( 378 hom. )
Consequence
ELP1
NM_003640.5 synonymous
NM_003640.5 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.437
Genes affected
ELP1 (HGNC:5959): (elongator acetyltransferase complex subunit 1) The protein encoded by this gene is a scaffold protein and a regulator for three different kinases involved in proinflammatory signaling. The encoded protein can bind NF-kappa-B-inducing kinase and I-kappa-B kinases through separate domains and assemble them into an active kinase complex. Mutations in this gene have been associated with familial dysautonomia. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2016]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.58).
BP6
Variant 9-108902935-A-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-108902935-A-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 364572.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr9-108902935-A-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.437 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAdExome4 highest subpopulation (SAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0598 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ELP1 | NM_003640.5 | c.1758T>G | p.Pro586= | synonymous_variant | 16/37 | ENST00000374647.10 | |
ELP1 | NM_001318360.2 | c.1416T>G | p.Pro472= | synonymous_variant | 16/37 | ||
ELP1 | NM_001330749.2 | c.711T>G | p.Pro237= | synonymous_variant | 14/35 | ||
ELP1 | XM_047423991.1 | c.1758T>G | p.Pro586= | synonymous_variant | 16/25 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ELP1 | ENST00000374647.10 | c.1758T>G | p.Pro586= | synonymous_variant | 16/37 | 1 | NM_003640.5 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00951 AC: 1448AN: 152232Hom.: 11 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
1448
AN:
152232
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0158 AC: 3961AN: 251174Hom.: 87 AF XY: 0.0186 AC XY: 2522AN XY: 135750
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
3961
AN:
251174
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
2522
AN XY:
135750
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0153 AC: 22339AN: 1460856Hom.: 378 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.0169 AC XY: 12282AN XY: 726800
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
22339
AN:
1460856
Hom.:
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
AC XY:
12282
AN XY:
726800
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00950 AC: 1447AN: 152350Hom.: 10 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00948 AC XY: 706AN XY: 74508
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
1447
AN:
152350
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
706
AN XY:
74508
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
90
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Nov 14, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Aug 22, 2017 | Variant summary: The IKBKAP c.1758T>G (p.Pro586Pro) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide, resulting in a synonymous change. One in silico tool predicts a polymorphism outcome for this variant. 5/5 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. ESE finder predicts that this variant may affect ESE sites. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. This variant was found in 1977/119930 control chromosomes (50 homozygotes) at a frequency of 0.0164846, which is approximately 9 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic IKBKAP variant (0.001838), suggesting this variant is likely a benign polymorphism. In addition, one clinical diagnostic laboratory classified this variant as benign and another lab classified it as uncertain significance, all without evidence for independent evaluation. The variant of interest has not, to our knowledge, been reported in affected individuals via publications; nor evaluated for functional impact by in vivo/vitro studies. Taken together, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Familial dysautonomia Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | May 18, 2021 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | May 10, 2017 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at