chr9-108917660-T-C
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_003640.5(ELP1):āc.751A>Gā(p.Ser251Gly) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0212 in 1,612,468 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 452 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Genomes: š 0.016 ( 30 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š: 0.022 ( 422 hom. )
Consequence
ELP1
NM_003640.5 missense
NM_003640.5 missense
Scores
1
7
10
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 3.58
Genes affected
ELP1 (HGNC:5959): (elongator acetyltransferase complex subunit 1) The protein encoded by this gene is a scaffold protein and a regulator for three different kinases involved in proinflammatory signaling. The encoded protein can bind NF-kappa-B-inducing kinase and I-kappa-B kinases through separate domains and assemble them into an active kinase complex. Mutations in this gene have been associated with familial dysautonomia. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2016]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.012105852).
BP6
Variant 9-108917660-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-108917660-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 137569.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr9-108917660-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.016 (2405/150776) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.0248 (1678/67570). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0238. There are 30 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 1175 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 30 AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ELP1 | NM_003640.5 | c.751A>G | p.Ser251Gly | missense_variant | 9/37 | ENST00000374647.10 | NP_003631.2 | |
ELP1 | NM_001318360.2 | c.409A>G | p.Ser137Gly | missense_variant | 9/37 | NP_001305289.1 | ||
ELP1 | XM_047423991.1 | c.751A>G | p.Ser251Gly | missense_variant | 9/25 | XP_047279947.1 | ||
ELP1 | NM_001330749.2 | c.-297A>G | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 7/35 | NP_001317678.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ELP1 | ENST00000374647.10 | c.751A>G | p.Ser251Gly | missense_variant | 9/37 | 1 | NM_003640.5 | ENSP00000363779.5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0160 AC: 2404AN: 150658Hom.: 30 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
2404
AN:
150658
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0176 AC: 4435AN: 251482Hom.: 67 AF XY: 0.0182 AC XY: 2469AN XY: 135916
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
4435
AN:
251482
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
2469
AN XY:
135916
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0218 AC: 31808AN: 1461692Hom.: 422 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0211 AC XY: 15325AN XY: 727164
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
31808
AN:
1461692
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
15325
AN XY:
727164
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0160 AC: 2405AN: 150776Hom.: 30 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0160 AC XY: 1175AN XY: 73656
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
2405
AN:
150776
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
1175
AN XY:
73656
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
84
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
104
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
27
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
195
ExAC
AF:
AC:
2288
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
13
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Familial dysautonomia Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | Oct 09, 2014 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Sep 16, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | May 18, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
not specified Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Mar 28, 2023 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Apr 03, 2014 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
not provided Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Nov 29, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Benign
T
Eigen
Uncertain
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
D
LIST_S2
Benign
T
MetaRNN
Benign
T
MetaSVM
Benign
T
MutationAssessor
Pathogenic
M
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
D
REVEL
Benign
Sift
Uncertain
D
Sift4G
Benign
T
Polyphen
P
Vest4
MPC
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at