chr9-108926548-C-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_003640.5(ELP1):c.441G>A(p.Gln147=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0901 in 1,611,970 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 6,925 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.081 ( 585 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.091 ( 6340 hom. )
Consequence
ELP1
NM_003640.5 synonymous
NM_003640.5 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -1.05
Genes affected
ELP1 (HGNC:5959): (elongator acetyltransferase complex subunit 1) The protein encoded by this gene is a scaffold protein and a regulator for three different kinases involved in proinflammatory signaling. The encoded protein can bind NF-kappa-B-inducing kinase and I-kappa-B kinases through separate domains and assemble them into an active kinase complex. Mutations in this gene have been associated with familial dysautonomia. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2016]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.57).
BP6
Variant 9-108926548-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-108926548-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 137583.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr9-108926548-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.05 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.108 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ELP1 | NM_003640.5 | c.441G>A | p.Gln147= | synonymous_variant | 5/37 | ENST00000374647.10 | |
ELP1 | NM_001318360.2 | c.99G>A | p.Gln33= | synonymous_variant | 5/37 | ||
ELP1 | XM_047423991.1 | c.441G>A | p.Gln147= | synonymous_variant | 5/25 | ||
ELP1 | NM_001330749.2 | c.-419G>A | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 5/35 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ELP1 | ENST00000374647.10 | c.441G>A | p.Gln147= | synonymous_variant | 5/37 | 1 | NM_003640.5 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0813 AC: 12367AN: 152112Hom.: 585 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
12367
AN:
152112
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0944 AC: 23659AN: 250620Hom.: 1254 AF XY: 0.0956 AC XY: 12950AN XY: 135488
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
23659
AN:
250620
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
12950
AN XY:
135488
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0911 AC: 132925AN: 1459740Hom.: 6340 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0919 AC XY: 66765AN XY: 726190
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
132925
AN:
1459740
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
66765
AN XY:
726190
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0812 AC: 12365AN: 152230Hom.: 585 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0827 AC XY: 6157AN XY: 74438
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
12365
AN:
152230
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
6157
AN XY:
74438
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
414
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Familial dysautonomia Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 01, 2021 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | May 10, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Apr 17, 2014 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at