chr9-114406535-G-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -3 ACMG points: 0P and 3B. BP4_ModerateBS1_Supporting

The NM_015404.4(WHRN):​c.2056C>A​(p.Pro686Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000235 in 1,613,640 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000020 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000024 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

WHRN
NM_015404.4 missense

Scores

3
5
11

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: 9.15

Publications

1 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
WHRN (HGNC:16361): (whirlin) This gene is thought to function in the organization and stabilization of sterocilia elongation and actin cystoskeletal assembly, based on studies of the related mouse gene. Mutations in this gene have been associated with autosomal recessive non-syndromic deafness and Usher Syndrome. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2016]
WHRN Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Usher syndrome type 2D
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia, Ambry Genetics, G2P
  • autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 31
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, PanelApp Australia
  • nonsyndromic genetic hearing loss
    Inheritance: AR Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • hearing loss, autosomal recessive
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Usher syndrome type 2
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -3 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.12082654).
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. GnomAdExome4 allele frequency = 0.000024 (35/1461296) while in subpopulation AMR AF = 0.000783 (35/44714). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000578. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAdExome4. There are 19 alleles in the male GnomAdExome4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
WHRNNM_015404.4 linkc.2056C>A p.Pro686Thr missense_variant Exon 9 of 12 ENST00000362057.4 NP_056219.3 Q9P202-1B9EGE6

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
WHRNENST00000362057.4 linkc.2056C>A p.Pro686Thr missense_variant Exon 9 of 12 1 NM_015404.4 ENSP00000354623.3 Q9P202-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000197
AC:
3
AN:
152226
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000196
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000116
AC:
29
AN:
249864
AF XY:
0.000118
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000839
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000240
AC:
35
AN:
1461296
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0000261
AC XY:
19
AN XY:
726860
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
33472
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000783
AC:
35
AN:
44714
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26116
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39692
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
86238
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53230
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
1111692
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
60374
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.495
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
3
5
8
10
13
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000197
AC:
3
AN:
152344
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0000403
AC XY:
3
AN XY:
74488
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
41586
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000196
AC:
3
AN:
15302
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5170
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4832
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10626
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
68036
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.525
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
0
1
1
2
2
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000491
ExAC
AF:
0.0000824
AC:
10

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:6
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Uncertain:2
Jan 19, 2016
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

The p.Pro686Thr variant in DFNB31 has been previously identified by our laborato ry in 1 Hispanic individual with hearing loss; however, a variant on the remaini ng copy of DFNB31 has not been identified. It has been identified in 10/11564 La tino chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadins titute.org; dbSNP rs201690920). Although this variant has been seen in the gene ral population, its frequency is not high enough to rule out a pathogenic role. Computational prediction tools and conservation analysis do not provide strong support for or against an impact to the protein. In summary, the clinical signif icance of the p.Pro686Thr variant is uncertain. -

May 05, 2015
Genomic Diagnostic Laboratory, Division of Genomic Diagnostics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Uncertain:2
Nov 22, 2024
GeneDx
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge -

Oct 24, 2022
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This sequence change replaces proline, which is neutral and non-polar, with threonine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 686 of the WHRN protein (p.Pro686Thr). This variant is present in population databases (rs201690920, gnomAD 0.09%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with WHRN-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 45666). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function are either unavailable or do not agree on the potential impact of this missense change (SIFT: "Deleterious"; PolyPhen-2: "Probably Damaging"; Align-GVGD: "Class C0"). In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 31 Uncertain:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Usher syndrome type 2D Uncertain:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.21
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.25
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.20
CADD
Pathogenic
26
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.25
.;.;T
Eigen
Pathogenic
0.71
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.65
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.99
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.92
D;D;D
M_CAP
Benign
0.043
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.12
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.1
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.5
.;.;M
PhyloP100
9.2
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.67
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-2.4
N;N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.25
Sift
Pathogenic
0.0
D;D;D
Sift4G
Benign
0.27
T;T;T
Polyphen
1.0
.;D;D
Vest4
0.52
MutPred
0.17
.;.;Gain of phosphorylation at P686 (P = 0.0359);
MVP
0.51
MPC
0.55
ClinPred
0.31
T
GERP RS
5.1
Varity_R
0.39
gMVP
0.55
Mutation Taster
=48/52
disease causing

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs201690920; hg19: chr9-117168815; API