chr9-120402912-T-C

Position:

chr9-120402912-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 2P and 5B. PM2BP4_StrongBS1_Supporting

The ENST00000349780.9(CDK5RAP2):c.5201A>G(p.Tyr1734Cys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000124 in 1,614,148 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00066 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000068 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CDK5RAP2
ENST00000349780.9 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.26

Variant links:

Genes affected

CDK5RAP2 (HGNC:18672): (CDK5 regulatory subunit associated protein 2) This gene encodes a regulator of CDK5 (cyclin-dependent kinase 5) activity. The protein encoded by this gene is localized to the centrosome and Golgi complex, interacts with CDK5R1 and pericentrin (PCNT), plays a role in centriole engagement and microtubule nucleation, and has been linked to primary microcephaly and Alzheimer's disease. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2013]

CDK5RAP2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.

PM2

Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.04922238).

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000657 (100/152272) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00229 (95/41558). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00191. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 40 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CDK5RAP2	NM_018249.6 linkuse as main transcript	c.5201A>G	p.Tyr1734Cys	missense_variant	34/38	ENST00000349780.9	NP_060719.4

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
CDK5RAP2	ENST00000349780.9 linkuse as main transcript	c.5201A>G	p.Tyr1734Cys	missense_variant	34/38	1	NM_018249.6	ENSP00000343818	P4	Q96SN8-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000657

AC:

100

AN:

152154

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00229

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000196

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000414

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000191

AC:

AN:

251418

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.0000736

AC XY:

AN XY:

135892

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00234

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000231

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00000879

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000163

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000684

AC:

100

AN:

1461876

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000564

AC XY:

AN XY:

727242

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00230

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000291

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000116

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00000270

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0000993

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000657

AC:

100

AN:

152272

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000537

AC XY:

AN XY:

74446

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00229

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000196

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000414

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.000136

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000816

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00295

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.000231

AC:

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00202

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:2

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Microcephaly 3, primary, autosomal recessive

Uncertain:2

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina	Jan 13, 2018	This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Baylor Genetics	Nov 16, 2018	This variant was determined to be of uncertain significance according to ACMG Guidelines, 2015 [PMID:25741868]. -

not specified

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

May 17, 2017

- -

not provided

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Oct 11, 2023

- -

CDK5RAP2-related disorder

Benign:1

Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided

clinical testing

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Apr 11, 2022

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.23

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.20

BayesDel_noAF

Uncertain

-0.070

CADD

Benign

DANN

Uncertain

0.99

DEOGEN2

Pathogenic

0.80

.;D;.;.;.

Eigen

Benign

0.17

Eigen_PC

Benign

0.055

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.89

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.95

D;D;D;D;D

M_CAP

Benign

0.085

MetaRNN

Benign

0.049

T;T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Uncertain

-0.16

MutationAssessor

Uncertain

2.4

.;M;.;.;.

MutationTaster

Benign

0.61

N;N;N;N

PrimateAI

Benign

0.47

PROVEAN

Pathogenic

-7.3

.;D;D;D;D

REVEL

Uncertain

0.39

Sift

Pathogenic

0.0

.;D;D;D;D

Sift4G

Pathogenic

0.0

D;D;D;D;D

Polyphen

1.0, 1.0

.;D;D;D;D

Vest4

0.74

MVP

0.80

MPC

0.48

ClinPred

0.22

GERP RS

2.9

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Varity_R

0.41

gMVP

0.65

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over