chr9-128222476-C-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_004408.4(DNM1):c.1008C>T(p.Phe336=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.532 in 1,613,764 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 236,688 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.43 ( 17223 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.54 ( 219465 hom. )
Consequence
DNM1
NM_004408.4 synonymous
NM_004408.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.579
Genes affected
DNM1 (HGNC:2972): (dynamin 1) This gene encodes a member of the dynamin subfamily of GTP-binding proteins. The encoded protein possesses unique mechanochemical properties used to tubulate and sever membranes, and is involved in clathrin-mediated endocytosis and other vesicular trafficking processes. Actin and other cytoskeletal proteins act as binding partners for the encoded protein, which can also self-assemble leading to stimulation of GTPase activity. More than sixty highly conserved copies of the 3' region of this gene are found elsewhere in the genome, particularly on chromosomes Y and 15. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been described. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.3).
BP6
Variant 9-128222476-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-128222476-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 380777.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr9-128222476-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.579 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AMR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.592 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DNM1 | NM_004408.4 | c.1008C>T | p.Phe336= | synonymous_variant | 8/22 | ENST00000372923.8 | NP_004399.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DNM1 | ENST00000372923.8 | c.1008C>T | p.Phe336= | synonymous_variant | 8/22 | 1 | NM_004408.4 | ENSP00000362014 | A1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.433 AC: 65773AN: 151902Hom.: 17215 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
65773
AN:
151902
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.542 AC: 136150AN: 251218Hom.: 39293 AF XY: 0.546 AC XY: 74113AN XY: 135808
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
136150
AN:
251218
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
74113
AN XY:
135808
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.542 AC: 792635AN: 1461744Hom.: 219465 Cov.: 62 AF XY: 0.543 AC XY: 394906AN XY: 727172
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
792635
AN:
1461744
Hom.:
Cov.:
62
AF XY:
AC XY:
394906
AN XY:
727172
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.433 AC: 65779AN: 152020Hom.: 17223 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.439 AC XY: 32590AN XY: 74278
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
65779
AN:
152020
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
32590
AN XY:
74278
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
1978
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jan 06, 2016 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Unidad de Genómica Garrahan, Hospital de Pediatría Garrahan | Jul 15, 2024 | This variant is classified as Benign based on local population frequency. This variant was detected in 88% of patients studied in a panel designed for Epileptic and Developmental Encephalopathy and Progressive Myoclonus Epilepsy. Number of patients: 82. Only high quality variants are reported. - |
Developmental and epileptic encephalopathy, 31A Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 30, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Apr 20, 2017 | - - |
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Dec 31, 2015 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at