chr9-128323100-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. The variant received 7 ACMG points: 7P and 0B. PM2PP3_StrongPP5
The NM_016035.5(COQ4):c.155T>C(p.Leu52Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Pathogenic (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_016035.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- mitochondrial diseaseInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- neonatal encephalomyopathy-cardiomyopathy-respiratory distress syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_pathogenic. The variant received 7 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_016035.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COQ4 | NM_016035.5 | MANE Select | c.155T>C | p.Leu52Ser | missense | Exon 2 of 7 | NP_057119.3 | ||
| COQ4 | NM_001305942.2 | c.155T>C | p.Leu52Ser | missense | Exon 2 of 4 | NP_001292871.2 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COQ4 | ENST00000300452.8 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.155T>C | p.Leu52Ser | missense | Exon 2 of 7 | ENSP00000300452.3 | ||
| COQ4 | ENST00000926106.1 | c.155T>C | p.Leu52Ser | missense | Exon 2 of 8 | ENSP00000596165.1 | |||
| COQ4 | ENST00000926105.1 | c.155T>C | p.Leu52Ser | missense | Exon 2 of 8 | ENSP00000596164.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 34
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at