chr9-130494963-G-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. The variant received 9 ACMG points: 9P and 0B. PM1PM2PP2PP3_Strong
The NM_054012.4(ASS1):c.1067G>T(p.Gly356Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_054012.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- citrullinemia type IInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, Myriad Women’s Health, G2P
- acute neonatal citrullinemia type IInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- adult-onset citrullinemia type IInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_pathogenic. The variant received 9 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASS1 | ENST00000352480.10 | c.1067G>T | p.Gly356Val | missense_variant | Exon 13 of 15 | 1 | NM_054012.4 | ENSP00000253004.6 | ||
ASS1 | ENST00000372393.7 | c.1067G>T | p.Gly356Val | missense_variant | Exon 14 of 16 | 5 | ENSP00000361469.2 | |||
ASS1 | ENST00000372394.5 | c.1067G>T | p.Gly356Val | missense_variant | Exon 14 of 16 | 2 | ENSP00000361471.1 | |||
ASS1 | ENST00000372386.6 | n.338G>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 4 of 6 | 3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 31
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Citrullinemia type I Uncertain:1
This submission and the accompanying classification are no longer maintained by the submitter. For more information on current observations and classification, please contact variantquestions@myriad.com. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at