chr9-2039793-A-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 1P and 20B. PP2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_003070.5(SMARCA2):āc.683A>Cā(p.Gln228Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0477 in 1,595,690 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1,950 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_003070.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMARCA2 | NM_003070.5 | c.683A>C | p.Gln228Pro | missense_variant | 4/34 | ENST00000349721.8 | NP_003061.3 | |
SMARCA2 | NM_001289396.1 | c.683A>C | p.Gln228Pro | missense_variant | 4/34 | NP_001276325.1 | ||
SMARCA2 | NM_139045.4 | c.683A>C | p.Gln228Pro | missense_variant | 4/33 | NP_620614.2 | ||
SMARCA2 | NM_001289397.2 | c.683A>C | p.Gln228Pro | missense_variant | 4/33 | NP_001276326.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMARCA2 | ENST00000349721.8 | c.683A>C | p.Gln228Pro | missense_variant | 4/34 | 5 | NM_003070.5 | ENSP00000265773 | P2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0388 AC: 5892AN: 151810Hom.: 153 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0400 AC: 9200AN: 230138Hom.: 218 AF XY: 0.0406 AC XY: 5145AN XY: 126674
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0487 AC: 70266AN: 1443764Hom.: 1797 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.0483 AC XY: 34667AN XY: 718060
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0388 AC: 5895AN: 151926Hom.: 153 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0371 AC XY: 2757AN XY: 74254
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jul 31, 2018 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 15, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Aug 15, 2013 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genomic Diagnostic Laboratory, Division of Genomic Diagnostics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia | Dec 31, 2014 | - - |
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Mar 16, 2016 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Nicolaides-Baraitser syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at