chr9-2039793-A-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points: 2P and 2B. PM2BP4_Moderate
The NM_003070.5(SMARCA2):c.683A>T(p.Gln228Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000693 in 1,443,918 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. Q228P) has been classified as Benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_003070.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- intellectual disability-sparse hair-brachydactyly syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, G2P, Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMARCA2 | NM_003070.5 | c.683A>T | p.Gln228Leu | missense_variant | Exon 4 of 34 | ENST00000349721.8 | NP_003061.3 | |
| SMARCA2 | NM_001289396.2 | c.683A>T | p.Gln228Leu | missense_variant | Exon 4 of 34 | NP_001276325.1 | ||
| SMARCA2 | NM_139045.4 | c.683A>T | p.Gln228Leu | missense_variant | Exon 4 of 33 | NP_620614.2 | ||
| SMARCA2 | NM_001289397.2 | c.683A>T | p.Gln228Leu | missense_variant | Exon 4 of 33 | NP_001276326.1 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.93e-7 AC: 1AN: 1443918Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.00000139 AC XY: 1AN XY: 718148 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at