chr9-21384817-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_000605.4(IFNA2):c.513G>A(p.Met171Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000883 in 1,613,418 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 21 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 11/18 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000605.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IFNA2 | NM_000605.4 | c.513G>A | p.Met171Ile | missense_variant | 1/1 | ENST00000380206.4 | NP_000596.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IFNA2 | ENST00000380206.4 | c.513G>A | p.Met171Ile | missense_variant | 1/1 | NM_000605.4 | ENSP00000369554 | P1 | ||
MIR31HG | ENST00000698342.1 | n.726-4458G>A | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00440 AC: 669AN: 152190Hom.: 7 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00123 AC: 308AN: 250612Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.000842 AC XY: 114AN XY: 135426
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000517 AC: 755AN: 1461110Hom.: 14 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000460 AC XY: 334AN XY: 726852
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00440 AC: 670AN: 152308Hom.: 7 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00397 AC XY: 296AN XY: 74476
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | May 21, 2018 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at