chr9-2191309-C-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 1P and 20B. PP2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_003070.5(SMARCA2):āc.4638C>Gā(p.Asp1546Glu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.138 in 1,613,644 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 17,786 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_003070.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMARCA2 | NM_003070.5 | c.4638C>G | p.Asp1546Glu | missense_variant | 33/34 | ENST00000349721.8 | NP_003061.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMARCA2 | ENST00000349721.8 | c.4638C>G | p.Asp1546Glu | missense_variant | 33/34 | 5 | NM_003070.5 | ENSP00000265773.5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.172 AC: 26197AN: 152044Hom.: 2595 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.169 AC: 42451AN: 251364Hom.: 4359 AF XY: 0.167 AC XY: 22693AN XY: 135866
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.134 AC: 196379AN: 1461482Hom.: 15187 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.137 AC XY: 99456AN XY: 727048
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.172 AC: 26209AN: 152162Hom.: 2599 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.176 AC XY: 13075AN XY: 74400
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jul 03, 2018 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 19363039) - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | - | Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. - |
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Mar 16, 2016 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Nicolaides-Baraitser syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Mar 06, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Nicolaides-Baraitser syndrome;C5443984:Blepharophimosis-impaired intellectual development syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Dec 06, 2021 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at