chr9-37784852-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2_Supporting

The NM_016042.4(EXOSC3):​c.193G>A​(p.Val65Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000383 in 1,608,008 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0021 ( 2 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00020 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

EXOSC3
NM_016042.4 missense

Scores

1
2
16

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.95

Publications

2 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
EXOSC3 (HGNC:17944): (exosome component 3) This gene encodes a non-catalytic component of the human exosome, a complex with 3'-5' exoribonuclease activity that plays a role in numerous RNA processing and degradation activities. Related pseudogenes of this gene are found on chromosome 19 and 21. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been described. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2012]
EXOSC3 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • pontocerebellar hypoplasia type 1B
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp, G2P, Illumina
  • pontocerebellar hypoplasia type 1
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.009042144).
BP6
Variant 9-37784852-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-37784852-C-T is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 210963.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 2 AR geneVariant has number of homozygotes lower than other variant known as pathogenic in the gene, so the strength is limited to Supporting.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
EXOSC3NM_016042.4 linkc.193G>A p.Val65Ile missense_variant Exon 1 of 4 ENST00000327304.10 NP_057126.2 Q9NQT5-1
EXOSC3NM_001002269.2 linkc.193G>A p.Val65Ile missense_variant Exon 1 of 3 NP_001002269.1 Q9NQT5-2Q9NYS3

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
EXOSC3ENST00000327304.10 linkc.193G>A p.Val65Ile missense_variant Exon 1 of 4 1 NM_016042.4 ENSP00000323046.4 Q9NQT5-1
ENSG00000255872ENST00000540557.1 linkn.*761-789G>A intron_variant Intron 8 of 11 5 ENSP00000457548.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00212
AC:
323
AN:
152244
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00728
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000589
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000470
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00287
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000487
AC:
114
AN:
234188
AF XY:
0.000361
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00641
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000211
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000457
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000287
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000349
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000202
AC:
294
AN:
1455646
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.000175
AC XY:
127
AN XY:
723858
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00691
AC:
230
AN:
33302
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000228
AC:
10
AN:
43852
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
25946
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39324
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
85406
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000476
AC:
25
AN:
52532
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000174
AC:
1
AN:
5760
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00000270
AC:
3
AN:
1109408
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000416
AC:
25
AN:
60116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.478
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
21
42
63
84
105
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00211
AC:
322
AN:
152362
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00189
AC XY:
141
AN XY:
74512
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00726
AC:
302
AN:
41596
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000523
AC:
8
AN:
15310
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5186
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4826
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000470
AC:
5
AN:
10628
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000147
AC:
1
AN:
68030
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00284
AC:
6
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.497
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
15
31
46
62
77
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000941
Hom.:
3
Bravo
AF:
0.00245
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00909
AC:
40
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.000693
AC:
84
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000577
AC:
2
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Pontocerebellar hypoplasia type 1B Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Jan 27, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Uncertain:1
Oct 08, 2014
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

EXOSC3-related disorder Benign:1
Nov 19, 2019
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Oct 27, 2023
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

not provided Benign:1
May 05, 2022
GeneDx
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

See Variant Classification Assertion Criteria. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.12
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.39
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.34
CADD
Benign
17
DANN
Uncertain
0.99
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.0056
T;.
Eigen
Benign
-0.38
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.24
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.93
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.66
T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.074
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0090
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.83
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.0
L;L
PhyloP100
1.9
PrimateAI
Pathogenic
0.85
D
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.010
N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.097
Sift
Benign
0.27
T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.31
T;T
Polyphen
0.035
B;.
Vest4
0.21
MVP
0.48
MPC
0.13
ClinPred
0.057
T
GERP RS
4.3
PromoterAI
0.019
Neutral
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.2
Varity_R
0.13
gMVP
0.23
Mutation Taster
=85/15
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.020
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs62640002; hg19: chr9-37784849; API