chr9-91723646-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_004560.4(ROR2):c.*16G>A variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.705 in 1,611,668 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 403,778 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.73 ( 40802 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.70 ( 362976 hom. )
Consequence
ROR2
NM_004560.4 3_prime_UTR
NM_004560.4 3_prime_UTR
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -3.29
Genes affected
ROR2 (HGNC:10257): (receptor tyrosine kinase like orphan receptor 2) The protein encoded by this gene is a receptor protein tyrosine kinase and type I transmembrane protein that belongs to the ROR subfamily of cell surface receptors. The protein may be involved in the early formation of the chondrocytes and may be required for cartilage and growth plate development. Mutations in this gene can cause brachydactyly type B, a skeletal disorder characterized by hypoplasia/aplasia of distal phalanges and nails. In addition, mutations in this gene can cause the autosomal recessive form of Robinow syndrome, which is characterized by skeletal dysplasia with generalized limb bone shortening, segmental defects of the spine, brachydactyly, and a dysmorphic facial appearance. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
BP4
?
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.92).
BP6
?
Variant 9-91723646-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-91723646-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 199097.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr9-91723646-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
?
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.905 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROR2 | NM_004560.4 | c.*16G>A | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 9/9 | ENST00000375708.4 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROR2 | ENST00000375708.4 | c.*16G>A | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 9/9 | 1 | NM_004560.4 | P1 | ||
ROR2 | ENST00000375715.5 | c.1920+508G>A | intron_variant | 1 | |||||
ROR2 | ENST00000550066.5 | n.3316G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 11/11 | 2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.730 AC: 110898AN: 151902Hom.: 40747 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 genomes
?
AF:
AC:
110898
AN:
151902
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.735 AC: 182694AN: 248436Hom.: 68257 AF XY: 0.723 AC XY: 97410AN XY: 134788
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
182694
AN:
248436
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
97410
AN XY:
134788
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.703 AC: 1025973AN: 1459648Hom.: 362976 Cov.: 66 AF XY: 0.700 AC XY: 507900AN XY: 726090
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
1025973
AN:
1459648
Hom.:
Cov.:
66
AF XY:
AC XY:
507900
AN XY:
726090
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.730 AC: 111012AN: 152020Hom.: 40802 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.736 AC XY: 54684AN XY: 74312
GnomAD4 genome
?
AF:
AC:
111012
AN:
152020
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
54684
AN XY:
74312
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
2671
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Apr 13, 2016 | - - |
Autosomal recessive Robinow syndrome Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Nov 07, 2021 | - - |
Brachydactyly type B1 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Nov 07, 2021 | - - |
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Oct 16, 2018 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
Cadd
Benign
Dann
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at