chr9-91723689-G-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2
The NM_004560.4(ROR2):āc.2805C>Gā(p.Asp935Glu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00803 in 1,613,804 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 81 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004560.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROR2 | ENST00000375708.4 | c.2805C>G | p.Asp935Glu | missense_variant | 9/9 | 1 | NM_004560.4 | ENSP00000364860.3 | ||
ROR2 | ENST00000375715.5 | c.1920+465C>G | intron_variant | 1 | ENSP00000364867.1 | |||||
ROR2 | ENST00000550066.5 | n.3273C>G | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 11/11 | 2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00462 AC: 703AN: 152194Hom.: 2 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00486 AC: 1219AN: 250668Hom.: 8 AF XY: 0.00504 AC XY: 683AN XY: 135574
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00839 AC: 12256AN: 1461492Hom.: 79 Cov.: 92 AF XY: 0.00827 AC XY: 6015AN XY: 727030
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00462 AC: 703AN: 152312Hom.: 2 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00391 AC XY: 291AN XY: 74484
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:6
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2025 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jun 16, 2020 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Jul 01, 2024 | ROR2: BP4, BS2 - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics | May 15, 2017 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Autosomal recessive Robinow syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Jul 08, 2014 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Sep 17, 2015 | - - |
Brachydactyly type B1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at