chr9-94620425-G-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 4 ACMG points: 4P and 0B. PP3_Strong
The NM_000507.4(FBP1):c.237C>A(p.Asn79Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000112 in 1,614,042 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. N79N) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000507.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase deficiencyInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, PanelApp Australia, Genomics England PanelApp, Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 4 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBP1 | NM_000507.4 | c.237C>A | p.Asn79Lys | missense_variant | Exon 2 of 7 | ENST00000375326.9 | NP_000498.2 | |
FBP1 | NM_001127628.2 | c.237C>A | p.Asn79Lys | missense_variant | Exon 3 of 8 | NP_001121100.1 | ||
FBP1 | XM_006717005.5 | c.-10C>A | 5_prime_UTR_variant | Exon 2 of 7 | XP_006717068.1 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000329 AC: 5AN: 152180Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000159 AC: 4AN: 251476 AF XY: 0.00000736 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000889 AC: 13AN: 1461862Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00000825 AC XY: 6AN XY: 727234 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000329 AC: 5AN: 152180Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000269 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74336 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at